Culick, F. E. C. and Levine, J. N. (1974) Comparison of approximate and numerical analyses of nonlinear combustion instability. AIAA Papers, AIAA 74-201. AIAA . http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20101216-103529506
- Published Version
See Usage Policy.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20101216-103529506
At the present time, there are three general analytical techniques available to study problems of unsteady motions in rocket motors: linear stability analysis; approximate nonlinear analysis, founded on examining the behavior of coupled normal modes; and numerical calculations based on the conservation equations for one-dimensional flows. The last two yield the linear results as a limit. It is the main purpose of this paper to check the accuracy of the approximate analysis against the numerical analysis for some special cases. The results provide some justification for using the approximate analysis to study three dimensional problems.
|Item Type:||Report or Paper (Report)|
|Additional Information:||© 1974 AIAA. This work was supported partly by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Contract NAS 7-100; and partly by the Air Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory under Contract No. F04611-71-C-0060.|
|Group:||Guggenheim Jet Propulsion Center, GALCIT|
|Other Numbering System:|
|Official Citation:||Comparison of approximate and numerical analyses of nonlinear combustion instability CULICK, F. E. C., California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.; LEVINE, J. N., Ultrasystems, Inc., Irvine, Calif. AIAA-1974-201 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 12th, Washington, D.C., Jan 30-Feb 1, 1974, 15 p.|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Ruth Sustaita|
|Deposited On:||17 Dec 2010 18:23|
|Last Modified:||22 Sep 2016 21:52|
Repository Staff Only: item control page