Foltz, Kevin and Bruck, Jehoshua (2002) Time-Division is Better Than Frequency-Division for Periodic Internet Broadcasting. California Institute of Technology . (Unpublished) http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechPARADISE:2002.ETR042
|
PDF (Adobe PDF (1.3MB))
See Usage Policy. 1342Kb | |
|
Postscript
See Usage Policy. 396Kb |
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechPARADISE:2002.ETR042
Abstract
The broadcast disk provides an effective way to transmit information from a server to many clients. Information is broadcast cyclically and clients pick the information they need out of the broadcast. An example of such a system is a wireless web service where web servers broadcast to browsing clients. We consider two ways to send items over a broadcast channel and compare them using the metric of expected waiting time. The first is frequency-division, where each item is broadcast on its own subchannel of lower bandwidth. We find the optimal allocation of bandwidth to the subchannels using this method. Then we look at time-division, where items are sent sequentially on a single full-bandwidth channel. For items of equal length, we show that for any frequency-division broadcast schedule, we can find a better time-division schedule. Thus time-division is better than frequency-division.
| Item Type: | Report or Paper (Technical Report) |
|---|---|
| Group: | Parallel and Distributed Systems Group |
| Record Number: | CaltechPARADISE:2002.ETR042 |
| Persistent URL: | http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechPARADISE:2002.ETR042 |
| Related URLs: | |
| Usage Policy: | You are granted permission for individual, educational, research and non-commercial reproduction, distribution, display and performance of this work in any format. |
| ID Code: | 26034 |
| Collection: | CaltechPARADISE |
| Deposited By: | Imported from CaltechPARADISE |
| Deposited On: | 30 Aug 2002 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Dec 2012 13:51 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page


