Curren, Randall R. (1987) Explanations reconsidered. Humanities Working Paper, 120. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20111026-140811037
- Published Version
See Usage Policy.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20111026-140811037
Edna Ullmann-Margalit .introduced the notion of an invisiblehand explanation (I-H explanation) to the philosophical literature in 1978, and made a distinction between "aggregate" and "functional-evolutionary" (F-E) forms of I -H explanations. The present paper produces a substantially refined analysis of the forms and functions of I-H explanations. Sections (1) and (2) introduce the ideas of I-H and aggregate I-H explanation, respectively. Section (J) argues that no one form of explanation can serve the explanatory fUnctions Ullmann-Margalit attributes to aggregate explanations, and divides those explanatory functions between genetic and "systematic-dispositional" explanations. Section (4) identifies difficulties with the idea of F-E explanation in the social realm, and shows that any I-H explanations fitting the P-E mold would constitute simply a special class of "aggregate" explanation.
|Item Type:||Report or Paper (Working Paper)|
|Additional Information:||I owe thanks to Edna Ullmann-Margalit, Merrilee Salmon. Sandra Mitchell, and especially Carl G. Hempel and Joseph Camp. for their encouragement and useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.|
|Group:||Humanities Working Papers|
|Official Citation:||Curren, Randall R. Explanations reconsidered. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, 1987. Humanities Working Paper, No. 120.|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Lindsay Cleary|
|Deposited On:||26 Oct 2011 23:24|
|Last Modified:||26 Dec 2012 14:20|
Repository Staff Only: item control page