Goodin, William R. and McRae, Gregory J. and Seinfeld, John H. (1979) A Comparison of Interpolation Methods for Sparse Data: Application to Wind and Concentration Fields. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 18 (6). pp. 761-771. ISSN 0021-8952 http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120726-074013431
- Published Version
See Usage Policy.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120726-074013431
In order to produce gridded fields of pollutant concentration data and surface wind data for use in an air quality model, a number of techniques for interpolating sparse data values are compared. The techniques are compared using three data sets. One is an idealized concentration distribution to which the exact solution is known, the second is a potential flow field, while the third consists of surface ozone concentrations measured in the Los Angeles Basin on a particular day. The results of the study indicate that fitting a second-degree polynomial to each subregion (triangle) in the plane with each data point weighted according to its distance from the subregion provides a good compromise between accuracy and computational cost.
|Additional Information:||© 1979 American Meteorological Society. Manuscript received 1 December 1978, in final form 23 February 1979. Portions of this work were supported by the California Air Resources Board under Contract A5-046-87, and by the Department of Energy under Institutional Grant EY-76-G-03-1305.|
|Official Citation:||Goodin, William R., Gregory J. McRa, John H. Seinfeld, 1979: A Comparison of Interpolation Methods for Sparse Data: Application to Wind and Concentration Fields. J. Appl. Meteor., 18, 761–771. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1979)018<0761:ACOIMF>2.0.CO;2|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Ruth Sustaita|
|Deposited On:||30 Jul 2012 16:27|
|Last Modified:||26 Dec 2012 15:44|
Repository Staff Only: item control page