Hirschmann, M. M. and Asimow, Paul D. and Ghiorso, M. S. and Stolper, E. M. (1999) Calculation of Peridotite Partial Melting from Thermodynamic Models of Minerals and Melts. III. Controls on Isobaric Melt Production and the Effect of Water on Melt Production. Journal of Petrology, 40 (5). pp. 831-851. ISSN 0022-3530. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120821-130612151
Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120821-130612151
We present a rigorous calculation of the isobaric entropy (S) change of the melting reaction for peridotite (∂S/∂F)^(rxn)_P, where F is the melt fraction. Calculations at 1 and 2 GPa for fertile and depleted peridotite show that (∂S/∂F)^(rxn)_P varies as a function of extent of melting, temperature, and residual mineral assemblage. Changes in reaction stoichiometry cause discontinuous changes in ∂S/∂F)^(rxn)_P. Although calculated (∂S/∂F)^(rxn)_P varies by about a factor of two (from ∼0.25 to ∼0.5 J/K per g), such variations have relatively little effect on the formation of melt during adiabatic upwelling and a characteristic value suitable for peridotite partial melting at least up to 3 GPa is 0.3 J/K per g. Calculated variations in isobaric melt productivity, (∂F/∂T)_P, are large and have a significant effect on calculated adiabatic productivity, (∂F/∂P)_S. For partial melting of fertile peridotite, MELTS calculations suggest that near-solidus productivities are greatly reduced relative to productivities at higher melt fraction, owing to the incompatible behavior of Na_(2)O and the effect of this component on the liquidus temperature of partial melts. This behavior can also be demonstrated in simple model systems. Calculated near-solidus productivity for fractional or incremental batch melting of peridotite is lower than for batch melting, but after a small amount of melting (∼2%), productivity for the fractional or incremental batch melting case is greater than that of batch melting. This too can be demonstrated both by MELTS calculations and by calculations in simple model systems. Productivities for systems enriched in incompatible components are systematically lower than those depleted in such components, though the total melt produced at any given temperature will be greater for an enriched system. Exhaustion of clinopyroxene from peridotite residua decreases calculated productivity by about a factor of four, and therefore extensive partial melting of harzburgitic residues is inhibited. Calculated isothermal addition of water to hot peridotite causes melting to increase roughly linearly with the abundance of water added to the system, in agreement with the trend recognized earlier for Mariana trough basalts. Melt production for calculated addition of a subduction fluid (45 wt % H_(2)O, 45% Na_(2)O, 10% K_(2)O) is only slightly greater than for pure water. If water addition to peridotite is not forced to be isothermal by an externally imposed heat sink or by buffering from low variance chemical reactions, then it will approach isenthalpic conditions, which will reduce melt production per increment of water added by about a factor of two. For heating of peridotite containing minor amounts of H_(2)O, calculations suggest that the extent of melting will remain small (<5%) until the temperature is sufficient to generate significant melt for an equivalent dry peridotite. Small degrees of melting deep in mantle source regions caused by alkalis, CO_2, and H_(2)O probably result in several distinct melting regimes where melt productivities are very small and melt compositions are strongly influenced by high concentrations of alkalis and/or volatiles. Such regions are almost certainly in the garnet peridotite stability field, and owing to the small extents of melting and low productivities in these deep melting zones, they are likely regions for development of extreme U-series disequilibria.
|Additional Information:||© 1999 Oxford University Press. Received April 5, 1998; Accepted December 2, 1998. We thank Bill Minarik, Glenn Gaetani, and Gautam Sen for thorough and constructive reviews. This work was supported by OCE-9711735 (M.M.H.), OCE-9529790 (M.S.G.) and EAR-9219899 and OCE-9504517 (E.M.S.). This paper is Caltech Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences Contribution 8510.|
|Subject Keywords:||mantle melting; peridotite; hydrous melting; ridges; arcs|
|Other Numbering System:|
|Official Citation:||M. M. Hirschmann, P. D. Asimow, M. S. Ghiorso, and E. M. Stolper Calculation of Peridotite Partial Melting from Thermodynamic Models of Minerals and Melts. III. Controls on Isobaric Melt Production and the Effect of Water on Melt Production J. Petrology (1999) 40(5): 831-851 doi:10.1093/petroj/40.5.831|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Jason Perez|
|Deposited On:||21 Aug 2012 22:35|
|Last Modified:||23 Aug 2016 10:16|
Repository Staff Only: item control page