Padin, Stephen (2004) Location of the elevation axis in a large optical telescope. Applied Optics, 43 (5). pp. 1097-1107. ISSN 0003-6935 http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:PADao04a
See Usage Policy.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:PADao04a
Proposed designs for the next generation of large optical telescopes favor a tripod or quadrupod secondary support, and a primary supported from the back, but it is not yet clear whether the elevation axis should be in front of the primary or behind it. A study is described of the effect of elevation-axis location on key performance parameters (fundamental frequency, blockage, and wind-induced secondary decenter) for a 30-m Cassegrain telescope with a mount configuration that is typical of the new designs. For a fast (e.g., f/1) primary, the best location for the elevation axis is behind the primary. The penalty for moving the elevation axis in front of the primary is roughly a 40% decrease in fundamental frequency and a corresponding reduction in the control bandwidth for pointing and optical alignment.
|Additional Information:||© 2004 Optical Society of America Received 8 May 2003; revised manuscript received 20 October 2003; accepted 22 October 2003. The author thanks Doug MacMartin and Larry Stepp for helpful comments. This study was supported by the Caltech Discovery Fund.|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Archive Administrator|
|Deposited On:||27 Oct 2006|
|Last Modified:||26 Dec 2012 09:14|
Repository Staff Only: item control page