Simon, R. and Kimble, H. J. and Sudarshan, E. C. G. (1989) Simon et al. Reply. Physical Review Letters, 63 (9). p. 1021. ISSN 0031-9007 http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:SIMprl89
See Usage Policy.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:SIMprl89
In our letter  the electric fields of both the incident beam and the beam reflected from the mirror m1 are described in the same transverse coordinate system (x,y), by the pair of complex electric field components Ex,Ey arranged as a column. ... Bhandari's difficulty  originates partly from a possible lack of clarity in the specification of the polarization states in our Letter and partly from a misconception that the return beam going through L will necessarily imply retracing of the circuit yielding a net zero geometric phase.
|Additional Information:||© 1989 The American Physical Society Received 11 October 1988|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Archive Administrator|
|Deposited On:||17 Dec 2006|
|Last Modified:||26 Dec 2012 09:23|
Repository Staff Only: item control page