Neher, H. V. and Peterson, V. Z. and Stern, E. A. (1953) Fluctuations and latitude effect of cosmic rays at high altitudes and latitudes. Physical Review, 90 (4). pp. 655-674. ISSN 0031-899X. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:NEHpr53
See Usage Policy.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:NEHpr53
Using a newly developed ionization chamber, which transmits its information by radio, simultaneous balloon flights were made from widely separated stations in the summer of 1951. Bismarck, North Dakota (geomagnetic latitude, λm, 56°N) was used as a base station. Four flights were made from shipboard going north from Boston and five were made from Thule, Greenland (λm=88°N), simultaneous with those at Bismarck. In all, 28 successful flights were made by the two expeditions. In seeking to determine the geomagnetic effects on the low energy primaries, considerable information was gathered on the radiation that fluctuates from day to day. The following are the chief experimental findings together with some of the conclusions that may be drawn. (1) The fluctuations in the primary radiation at 90 000 feet were as much as 10 percent in a few days. (2) These were simultaneous (except as noted in the text) and very close to the same amount at the two stations. (3) The magnitude of the fluctuations at high altitudes was considerably larger than the geomagnetic effect between Bismarck and Thule. (4) The radiation that fluctuated contained both high (> 15 Bev/c) momentum and low (down to 1.5 Bev/c) momentum particles. (5) There was a good correlation between the fluctuations in the radiation at high altitudes and the fluctuations in the neutron and meson components at ground level. (6) The fact that no particles fluctuated at Thule that did not also fluctuate at Bismarck leads us to conclude that there are few, if any, low energy particles coming in at Thule that are not also present at Bismarck, otherwise they too would be expected to vary. (7) From the manner in which the fluctuating radiation is absorbed in the atmosphere, it is concluded that the fluctuations cannot be due to heavy primaries alone. Rather it appears that the particles that fluctuate are of the same nature as the other incoming particles but have somewhat less energy per particle. (8) Varying magnetic fields of the geomagnetic axially symmetrical type are discarded as being able to produce the kind of fluctuations observed. A more satisfactory mechanism appears to be varying electric fields. (9) There was a negative latitude effect in the total ionization at intermediate altitudes (30 000 to 50 000 feet) at high latitudes. This we attribute to the greater importance of μ-meson decay in the warmer air of the stratosphere which exists at the more northerly latitudes. The temperature coefficient arrived at is -0.19 percent °C-1. (10) There was a positive latitude effect in the total ionization above 60 000 feet at high latitudes. Evidence is presented to show that this is not likely to be due either to atmospheric effects or to low energy particles admitted by the earth's magnetic field above 66°N. We attribute this increase to the shadow effect of the earth. (11) The absence of particles with momenta in the range 1.5 to 0.6 Bev/Zc (0.8 to 0.14 Bev for protons), shown by (a) a lack of increase of ionization at very high altitudes between geomagnetic latitudes 58° and 66°N, (b) the absence of an increase of area under the ionization-depth curve at latitudes north of λm=58°N, and (c) the absence of any particles that fluctuate at Thule that do not also fluctuate at Bismarck, indicates a cutoff of the primary particles. (12) This cutoff we attribute to a general solar magnetic field. The magnetic moment required is 0.65×10^34 gauss-cm3 corresponding to a field at the solar equator of 19 gauss. (13) Any diurnal effect on cosmic rays due to such a magnetic moment would normally be hidden by the daily fluctuations of the primary particles.
|Additional Information:||©1953 The American Physical Society. Received 22 December 1952. In conclusion, we want to acknowledge the aid and cooperation of persons and agencies who made the carrying through of these experiments possible. The local Pasadena U.S. Office of Naval Research as well as the main ONR office in Washington were of great assistance in making many of the arrangements. The U.S. Navy and the Military Air Transport Service we wish to thank for furnishing the necessary transportation. We are also grateful to Captain F.W. Laing and the officers of the U.S.S. Wyandot for their cooperation in making the flights from shipboard in going north from Boston. We are particularly grateful to the U.S. Weather Bureau for the assistance rendered. Through Chief of the Bureau, Dr. F.W. Reichelderfer, arrangements were made for helium supplies at Bismarck, Thule and on shipboard. Also through his office arrangements were made for accommodations at the Weather Bureau station at Thule. We also want to thank Mr. Robert B. Sykes, Jr., Chief of the Arctic Operations Project, Mr. J. Glenn Dyer, Assistant Chief, and Mr. George Rabbitt, all of the Weather Bureau, for much needed assistance. The help of Mr. John T. Crowell, Officer in charge of the Weather Bureau station at Thule, and of Mr. F.J. Bavendick, in charge of the Bismarck Office, is gratefully acknowledged. We also want to express our appreciation to the Danish government for permission to go to Greenland to make these flights. The assistance of the Thule Colony Manager, Mr. Krough in enlisting the help of the Eskimos and Danish residents in locating instruments is also appreciated. By this means, two instruments were found, one, 150 miles north of Thule on the ice cap. Finally we want to thank Dr. Robert A. Millikan who assisted in making the arrangements and who was greatly interested in the project. Also we are grateful for the able assistance of Dr. Bernard Steenson and Mr. Alan Johnston in making the equipment, in its calibration, and in carrying out the flights. Our thanks are also due to Dr. Oliver Wulf for valuable discussions on the properties of the upper atmosphere.|
|Usage Policy:||No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.|
|Deposited By:||Tony Diaz|
|Deposited On:||08 Oct 2007|
|Last Modified:||26 Dec 2012 09:44|
Repository Staff Only: item control page