CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

DIC Challenge 2.0: Developing Images and Guidelines for Evaluating Accuracy and Resolution of 2D Analyses

Reu, P. L. and Blaysat, B. and Andó, E. and Bhattacharya, K. and Couture, C. and Couty, V. and Deb, D. and Fayad, S. S. and Iadicola, M. A. and Jaminion, S. and Klein, M. and Landauer, A. K. and Lava, P. and Liu, M. and Luan, L. K. and Olufsen, S. N. and Réthoré, J. and Roubin, E. and Seidl, D. T. and Siebert, T. and Stamati, O. and Toussaint, E. and Turner, D. and Vemulapati, C. S. R. and Weikert, T. and Witz, J. F. and Witzel, O. and Yang, J. (2022) DIC Challenge 2.0: Developing Images and Guidelines for Evaluating Accuracy and Resolution of 2D Analyses. Experimental Mechanics, 62 (4). pp. 639-654. ISSN 0014-4851. doi:10.1007/s11340-021-00806-6. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220202-403160900

Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220202-403160900

Abstract

Background: The DIC Challenge 2.0 follows on from the work accomplished in the first Digital Image Correlation (DIC) Challenge Reu et al. (Experimental Mechanics 58(7):1067, 1). The second challenge was required to better quantify the spatial resolution of 2D-DIC codes. Objective: The goal of this paper is to outline the methods and images for the 2D-DIC community to use to evaluate the performance of their codes and improve the implementation of 2D-DIC. Methods: This paper covers the creation of the new challenge images and the analysis and discussion of the results. It proposes a method of unambiguously defining spatial resolution for 2D-DIC and explores the tradeoff between displacement and strain noise (or measurement noise) and spatial resolution for a wide variety of DIC codes by a combination of the images presented here and a performance factor called Metrological Efficiency Indicator (MEI). Results: The performance of the 2D codes generally followed the expected theoretical performance, particularly in the measurement of the displacement. The comparison did however show that even with fairly uniform displacement performance, the calculation of the strain spatial resolution varied widely. Conclusions: This work provides a useful framework for understanding the tradeoff and analyzing the performance of the DIC software using the provided images. It details some of the unique errors associated with the analysis of these images, such as the Pattern Induced Bias (PIB) and imprecision introduced through the strain calculation method. Future authors claiming improvements in 2D accuracy are encouraged to use these images for an unambiguous comparison.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00806-6DOIArticle
https://rdcu.be/cGeJIPublisherFree ReadCube access
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Blaysat, B.0000-0002-4642-7451
Bhattacharya, K.0000-0003-2908-5469
Additional Information:© Society for Experimental Mechanics 2021. Received 20 October 2021; Accepted 27 October 2021; Published 04 January 2022. The 2D-DIC Challenge is dedicated to Dr. Laurent Robert. An active and important board member in the early years of the project, who passed away in 2016. He has been sorely missed in the experimental mechanics community. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA-0003525. B. Blaysat is grateful to the French National Research Agency (ANR) and to the French government research program “Investissements d’Avenir” for their financial support (ICAReS project, N ANR-18-CE08-0028-01 & IDEX-ISITE initiative 16-IDEX-0001, CAP 20-25). S. N. Olufsen gratefully appreciate the financial support from the Research Council of Norway through the Centre for Advanced Structural Analysis, Project No. 237885 (SFI-CASA). B. Blaysat acknowledges useful discussions with M. Grédiac. Conflicts of Interest: Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by NIST, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR)ANR-18-CE08-0028-01
Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR)16-IDEX-0001
Research Council of Norway237885
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-NA-0003525
Subject Keywords:Digital Image Correlation; DIC; DIC Challenge; Metrology; Full-field measurement
Issue or Number:4
DOI:10.1007/s11340-021-00806-6
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20220202-403160900
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220202-403160900
Official Citation:Reu, P.L., Blaysat, B., Andó, E. et al. DIC Challenge 2.0: Developing Images and Guidelines for Evaluating Accuracy and Resolution of 2D Analyses. Exp Mech 62, 639–654 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-021-00806-6
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:113212
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:02 Feb 2022 16:27
Last Modified:07 Apr 2022 17:22

Repository Staff Only: item control page