CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Comparison of the canonical transformation and energy functional formalisms for ab initio calculations of self-localized polarons

Luo, Yao and Chang, Benjamin K. and Bernardi, Marco (2022) Comparison of the canonical transformation and energy functional formalisms for ab initio calculations of self-localized polarons. Physical Review B, 105 (15). Art. No. 155132. ISSN 2469-9950. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.155132. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220329-173615663

[img] PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

626kB
[img] PDF - Submitted Version
See Usage Policy.

629kB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220329-173615663

Abstract

In materials with strong electron-phonon (e-ph) interactions, charge carriers can distort the surrounding lattice and become trapped, forming self-localized (small) polarons. We recently developed an ab initio approach based on canonical transformations to efficiently compute the formation and energetics of small polarons [N.-E. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 063805 (2021)]. A different approach based on a Landau-Pekar energy functional has been proposed in the recent literature [W. H. Sio et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246403 (2019); Phys. Rev. B 99, 235139 (2019)]. In this work, we analyze and compare these two methods in detail. We show that the small polaron energy is identical in the two formalisms when using the same polaron wave function. We also show that our canonical transformation formalism can predict polaron band structures and can properly treat zero- and finite-temperature lattice vibration effects, although at present using a fixed polaron wave function. Conversely, the energy functional approach can compute the polaron wave function, but as we show here, it neglects lattice vibrations and cannot address polaron self-localization and thermal band narrowing. Taken together, this work relates two different methods developed recently to study polarons from first-principles, highlighting their merits and shortcomings and discussing them both in a unified formalism.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.155132DOIArticle
https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.00794arXivDiscussion Paper
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Chang, Benjamin K.0000-0003-1304-9324
Bernardi, Marco0000-0001-7289-9666
Additional Information:© 2022 American Physical Society. Received 16 February 2022; accepted 6 April 2022; published 19 April 2022. The authors thank Nien-En Lee for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research and Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program under Award Number DE-SC0022088. M.B. was partially supported by the Liquid Sunlight Alliance, which is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Award No. DE-SC0021266. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
Group:Liquid Sunlight Alliance
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-SC0022088
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-SC0021266
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-AC02-05CH11231
Issue or Number:15
DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.155132
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20220329-173615663
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220329-173615663
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:114111
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: George Porter
Deposited On:30 Mar 2022 19:46
Last Modified:25 Apr 2022 18:10

Repository Staff Only: item control page