CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Process-Level Modeling Can Simultaneously Explain Secondary Organic Aerosol Evolution in Chambers and Flow Reactors

He, Yicong and Lambe, Andrew T. and Seinfeld, John H. and Cappa, Christopher D. and Pierce, Jeffrey R. and Jathar, Shantanu H. (2022) Process-Level Modeling Can Simultaneously Explain Secondary Organic Aerosol Evolution in Chambers and Flow Reactors. Environmental Science and Technology, 56 (10). pp. 6262-6273. ISSN 0013-936X. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c08520. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220520-231670000

[img] PDF (SOM-TOMAS model updates, SOA parameters based on environmental chamber data, OH suppression, PWL rates, and pseudo atmospheric simulations) - Supplemental Material
See Usage Policy.

1MB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220520-231670000

Abstract

Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) data gathered in environmental chambers (ECs) have been used extensively to develop parameters to represent SOA formation and evolution. The EC-based parameters are usually constrained to less than one day of photochemical aging but extrapolated to predict SOA aging over much longer timescales in atmospheric models. Recently, SOA has been increasingly studied in oxidation flow reactors (OFRs) over aging timescales of one to multiple days. However, these OFR data have been rarely used to validate or update the EC-based parameters. The simultaneous use of EC and OFR data is challenging because the processes relevant to SOA formation and evolution proceed over very different timescales, and both reactor types exhibit distinct experimental artifacts. In this work, we show that a kinetic SOA chemistry and microphysics model that accounts for various processes, including wall losses, aerosol phase state, heterogeneous oxidation, oligomerization, and new particle formation, can simultaneously explain SOA evolution in EC and OFR experiments, using a single consistent set of SOA parameters. With α-pinene as an example, we first developed parameters by fitting the model output to the measured SOA mass concentration and oxygen-to-carbon (O:C) ratio from an EC experiment (<1 day of aging). We then used these parameters to simulate SOA formation in OFR experiments and found that the model overestimated SOA formation (by a factor of 3–16) over photochemical ages ranging from 0.4 to 13 days, when excluding the abovementioned processes. By comprehensively accounting for these processes, the model was able to explain the observed evolution in SOA mass, composition (i.e., O:C), and size distribution in the OFR experiments. This work suggests that EC and OFR SOA data can be modeled consistently, and a synergistic use of EC and OFR data can aid in developing more refined SOA parameters for use in atmospheric models.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08520DOIArticle
https://github.com/yicongh/SOM-TOMAS-v2Related ItemFortran model
http://dx.doi.org/10.25675/10217/234640DOIModel outputs
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
He, Yicong0000-0001-8969-1167
Lambe, Andrew T.0000-0003-3031-701X
Seinfeld, John H.0000-0003-1344-4068
Cappa, Christopher D.0000-0002-3528-3368
Pierce, Jeffrey R.0000-0002-4241-838X
Jathar, Shantanu H.0000-0003-4106-2358
Additional Information:© 2022 American Chemical Society. Received 14 December 2021. Accepted 23 March 2022. Revised 22 March 2022. Published online 3 May 2022. Published in issue 17 May 2022. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science (DE-SC0017975, DE-SC0019000). This publication was partly developed under Assistance Agreement No. R840008 awarded by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to Shantanu Jathar. It has not been formally reviewed by EPA. The views expressed in this document are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Agency. EPA does not endorse any products or commercial services mentioned in this publication. We would like to thank Delphine Farmer and Beth Friedman for useful discussions related to OFR use and data. Data Availability: EC data in this work are from Dr. John Seinfeld’s group at the California Institute of Technology and OFR data in this work are from Dr. Andrew Lambe at Aerodyne Research Inc., both of which can be obtained upon request. The latest version of the Fortran model for SOM-TOMAS is archived on Github (https://github.com/yicongh/SOM-TOMAS-v2), and the model outputs are available at this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.25675/10217/234640. Author Contributions. Y.H. and S.H.J. designed the modeling study. Y.H. developed the model. Y.H. performed the simulations and analyzed the data along with S.H.J. and J.R.P. A.L. and J.H.S. provided the experimental data. C.D.C. supported the model development and analysis. Y.H. and S.H.J. wrote the paper with contributions from all co-authors. The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-SC0017975
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-SC0019000
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)R840008
Subject Keywords:aerosol processes; wall loss; phase state; heterogeneous oxidation; nucleation; environmental chamber; OFR; kinetic modeling
Issue or Number:10
DOI:10.1021/acs.est.1c08520
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20220520-231670000
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20220520-231670000
Official Citation:Process-Level Modeling Can Simultaneously Explain Secondary Organic Aerosol Evolution in Chambers and Flow Reactors Yicong He, Andrew T. Lambe, John H. Seinfeld, Christopher D. Cappa, Jeffrey R. Pierce, and Shantanu H. Jathar Environmental Science & Technology 2022 56 (10), 6262-6273 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c08520
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:114853
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: George Porter
Deposited On:24 May 2022 17:59
Last Modified:24 May 2022 17:59

Repository Staff Only: item control page