CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Neurobiological studies of risk assessment: A comparison of expected utility and mean-variance approaches

d'Acremont, M. and Bossaerts, Peter (2008) Neurobiological studies of risk assessment: A comparison of expected utility and mean-variance approaches. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 8 (4). pp. 363-374. ISSN 1530-7026. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:ACRcab08

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

1103Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:ACRcab08

Abstract

When modeling valuation under uncertainty, economists generally prefer expected utility because it has an axiomatic foundation, meaning that the resulting choices will satisfy a number of rationality requirements. In expected utility theory, values are computed by multiplying probabilities of each possible state of nature by the payoff in that state and summing the results. The drawback of this approach is that all state probabilities need to be dealt with separately, which becomes extremely cumbersome when it comes to learning. Finance academics and professionals, however, prefer to value risky prospects in terms of a trade-off between expected reward and risk, where the latter is usually measured in terms of reward variance. This mean-variance approach is fast and simple and greatly facilitates learning, but it impedes assigning values to new gambles on the basis of those of known ones. To date, it is unclear whether the human brain computes values in accordance with expected utility theory or with mean-variance analysis. In this article, we discuss the theoretical and empirical arguments that favor one or the other theory. We also propose a new experimental paradigm that could determine whether the human brain follows the expected utility or the mean-variance approach. Behavioral results of implementation of the paradigm are discussed.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/CABN.8.4.363DOIUNSPECIFIED
http://cabn.psychonomic-journals.org/content/8/4/363PublisherUNSPECIFIED
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Bossaerts, Peter0000-0003-2308-2603
Additional Information:© 2008 Psychonomic Society, Inc. Manuscript received March 10, 2008; revision accepted for publication July 30, 2008.
Issue or Number:4
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:ACRcab08
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:ACRcab08
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:13148
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Ruth Sustaita
Deposited On:29 Jan 2009 23:42
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 00:34

Repository Staff Only: item control page