CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Response to H.C. Howland, “Orbital orientation is not visual orientation”

Changizi, Mark and Shimojo, Shinsuke (2009) Response to H.C. Howland, “Orbital orientation is not visual orientation”. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257 (3). pp. 524-525. ISSN 0022-5193. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20090416-130102094

[img] PDF - Published Version
Restricted to Repository administrators only
See Usage Policy.

98Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20090416-130102094

Abstract

We have hypothesized that the size of the binocular field among mammals has been selected to maximize the visually surveyable region around the animal (Changizi and Shimojo, 2008). At first glance it may seem that this hypothesis should always predict lateral pointing eyes, and a consequently small binocular field width. However, the hypothesis does not predict lateral pointing eyes in cases where the environment is filled with leafy occlusions and the animal's interpupillary distance surpasses the typical widths of the leaves (when both of these apply, we call the environment “cluttered”). In such cases, within an animal's binocular region the eyes tend to sample the scene independently. Laterally directed eyes also sample the scene independently, but the binocular region benefits from a variety of binocular summation, lowering the threshold for the recognition of objects in the binocular field. Our hypothesis predicts that mammals outside of leafy environments should have small binocular fields, independent of the size of the animal; but it predicts that for animals in leafy environments, whereas small animals should have small binocular fields (because their interpupillary distance is small compared to the typical occlusion width), large animals should have large binocular fields (because the binocular region begins to become more powerful at object recognition). Our paper provided evidence consistent with these predictions.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.12.031DOIUNSPECIFIED
Additional Information:© 2009 Elsevier Ltd. Received 17 December 2008. Available online 3 January 2009.
Issue or Number:3
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20090416-130102094
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20090416-130102094
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:14002
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:22 Apr 2009 17:27
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 00:46

Repository Staff Only: item control page