CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences

Tricomi, Elizabeth and Rangel, Antonio and Camerer, Colin F. and O'Doherty, John P. (2010) Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature, 463 (7284). pp. 1089-1092. ISSN 0028-0836. doi:10.1038/nature08785. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20100315-155441332

[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Figure 1 and Legend and Supplementary Tables 1-2.) - Supplemental Material
See Usage Policy.

83kB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20100315-155441332

Abstract

A popular hypothesis in the social sciences is that humans have social preferences to reduce inequality in outcome distributions because it has a negative impact on their experienced reward. Although there is a large body of behavioural and anthropological evidence consistent with the predictions of these theories, there is no direct neural evidence for the existence of inequality-averse preferences. Such evidence would be especially useful because some behaviours that are consistent with a dislike for unequal outcomes could also be explained by concerns for social image or reciprocity, which do not require a direct aversion towards inequality. Here we use functional MRI to test directly for the existence of inequality-averse social preferences in the human brain. Inequality was created by recruiting pairs of subjects and giving one of them a large monetary endowment. While both subjects evaluated further monetary transfers from the experimenter to themselves and to the other participant, we measured neural responses in the ventral striatum and ventromedial prefrontal cortex, two areas that have been shown to be involved in the valuation of monetary and primary rewards in both social and non-social contexts. Consistent with inequality-averse models of social preferences, we find that activity in these areas was more responsive to transfers to others than to self in the ‘high-pay’ subject, whereas the activity of the ‘low-pay’ subject showed the opposite pattern. These results provide direct evidence for the validity of this class of models, and also show that the brain’s reward circuitry is sensitive to both advantageous and disadvantageous inequality.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08785 DOIArticle
https://rdcu.be/b3kv2PublisherFree ReadCube access
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Camerer, Colin F.0000-0003-4049-1871
O'Doherty, John P.0000-0003-0016-3531
Additional Information:© 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. Received 29 June; accepted 22 December 2009. We thank B. Bushong, N. Tetrault, S. Bray, J. Gläscher and R. Lee for their assistance. This work was supported by grants from the US National Science Foundation to J.O.D. (0617174), from the Human Frontiers of Science Program to C.F.C., and from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation to J.O.D., A.R., C.F.C. and the Caltech Brain Imaging Center. Author Contributions E.T., A.R., C.F.C. and J.O.D. designed the experiment, E.T. conducted the experiment and analysed the data, and E.T., A.R., C.F.C. and J.O.D. discussed the results and wrote the paper. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
NSFBCS-0617174
Human Frontier Science ProgramUNSPECIFIED
Gordon and Betty Moore FoundationUNSPECIFIED
Caltech Brain Imaging CenterUNSPECIFIED
Issue or Number:7284
DOI:10.1038/nature08785
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20100315-155441332
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20100315-155441332
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:17741
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:17 Mar 2010 17:21
Last Modified:08 Nov 2021 23:38

Repository Staff Only: item control page