Böse, M. and Heaton, T. and Hauksson, E.
(2012)
Rapid Estimation of Earthquake Source and Ground‐Motion Parameters for Earthquake Early Warning Using Data from a Single Three‐Component Broadband or Strong‐Motion Sensor.
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102
(2).
pp. 738-750.
ISSN 0037-1106.
doi:10.1785/0120110152.
https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120503-080024631
![[img]](https://authors.library.caltech.edu/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)  Preview |
|
PDF
- Published Version
See Usage Policy.
1MB |
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120503-080024631
Abstract
We propose a new algorithm to rapidly determine earthquake source and
ground-motion parameters for earthquake early warning (EEW). This algorithm uses
the acceleration, velocity, and displacement waveforms of a single three-component
broadband (BB) or strong-motion (SM) sensor to perform real-time earthquake/noise
discrimination and near/far source classification. When an earthquake is detected, the
algorithm estimates the moment magnitude M, epicentral distance Δ, and peak
ground velocity (PGV) at the site of observation. The algorithm was constructed
by using an artificial neural network (ANN) approach. Our training and test datasets
consist of 2431 three-component SM and BB records of 161 crustal earthquakes in
California, Japan, and Taiwan with 3.1 ≤ M ≤ 7.6 at Δ ≤ 115 km. First estimates become
available at t_0 = 0.25 s after the P pick and are regularly updated. We find that
displacement and velocity waveforms are most relevant for the estimation of M and
PGV, while acceleration is important for earthquake/noise discrimination. Including
site corrections reduces the errors up to 10%. The estimates improve by an additional
10% if we use both the vertical and horizontal components of recorded ground
motions. The uncertainties of the predicted parameters decrease with increasing time
window length t_0; larger magnitude events show a slower decay of these uncertainties
than small earthquakes. We compare our approach with the τ_c algorithm and find that
our prediction errors are around 60% smaller. However, in general there is a limitation
to the prediction accuracy an EEW system can provide if based on single-sensor
observations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|
Related URLs: | |
---|
ORCID: | |
---|
Additional Information: | © 2012 Seismological Society of America.
Manuscript received 18 May 2011.
This work is funded through contract G09AC00258 from USGS/ANSS to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech). This is contribution #10058 of the Seismological Laboratory, Geological and Planetary Sciences at Caltech. We would like to thank William H. Bakun and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments. |
---|
Group: | Seismological Laboratory |
---|
Funders: | Funding Agency | Grant Number |
---|
USGS | G09AC00258 |
|
---|
Other Numbering System: | Other Numbering System Name | Other Numbering System ID |
---|
Caltech Seismological Laboratory | 10058 |
|
---|
Issue or Number: | 2 |
---|
DOI: | 10.1785/0120110152 |
---|
Record Number: | CaltechAUTHORS:20120503-080024631 |
---|
Persistent URL: | https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120503-080024631 |
---|
Usage Policy: | No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided. |
---|
ID Code: | 31283 |
---|
Collection: | CaltechAUTHORS |
---|
Deposited By: |
Tony Diaz
|
---|
Deposited On: | 03 May 2012 22:49 |
---|
Last Modified: | 09 Nov 2021 19:49 |
---|
Repository Staff Only: item control page