CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Investigation of Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables for the Van Nuys Testbed

Porter, Keith A. and Beck, James L. and Shaikhutdinov, Rustem V. (2002) Investigation of Sensitivity of Building Loss Estimates to Major Uncertain Variables for the Van Nuys Testbed. PEER Report, 2002/0. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center , Berkeley, CA. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120919-152723083

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

888kB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120919-152723083

Abstract

A major component of a building-specific seismic loss analysis is the estimation of repair costs in future earthquakes. A number of uncertain variables contribute to the uncertainty in these cost estimates. Among these are ground-shaking intensity, details of the ground motion, mass, damping, and force-deformation behavior, component fragility, repair methods, contractor’s direct costs, and contractor’s overhead and profit, among others. This report addresses which of these significantly contribute to the overall uncertainty in future economic performance. We examine gross sensitivity by measuring the variation (or swing) of the economic performance when each variable is taken at its assumed median value and at its extremes, e.g., the 10th and 90th percentiles. Such a study is undertaken for a 1960s nonductile reinforced-concrete moment-frame building located in Van Nuys, California, which is one of two buildings studied by the PEER testbeds program. Here, economic performance is measured in terms of the repair costs associated with the (uncertain) highest shaking intensity the site will experience in the next 50 years. Repair costs are estimated using the assembly-based vulnerability (ABV) method and the site’s seismic hazard. We do not address all uncertainties. Notable among those excluded are the selection among competing models of hysteretic behavior of structural elements, the potential that fragility tests of structural and nonstructural elements do not accurately reflect actual field conditions, the selection among competing repair methods given a component damage state, the choice of nonunion versus union labor to perform repairs, and the potential for repair costs after an earthquake to be increased by demand-driven inflation (a phenomenon often called demand surge). Except for demand surge, all of these uncertainties can be examined in future ABV analyses. The study shows that among the parameters considered here, the top three contributors to uncertainty in earthquake repair cost, in decreasing order, are assembly capacity (i.e., for a building element, the relationship between physical damage and the relevant engineering demand parameter), shaking intensity (measured here in terms of damped elastic spectral acceleration, Sa), and details of the ground motion conditioned on Sa. Uncertainties in parameters of the structural model contribute modestly to overall uncertainty in economic performance, and are comparable in importance to the uncertainty in the unit costs that a contractor will experience in repairing the damage. These observations are based only on the demonstration building, but they do offer intriguing implications for performance-based earthquake engineering. If duplicated for other buildings, it may be that much performance uncertainty could be reduced through more-detailed study and modeling of building component damageability. In addition, seismic loss analyses might reasonably neglect uncertainties in structural modeling parameters, without substantially underestimating overall uncertainty.


Item Type:Report or Paper (Technical Report)
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://peer.berkeley.edu/publications/peer_reports/reports_2002/0203.pdfPublisherUNSPECIFIED
Additional Information:This work was supported in part by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center through the Earthquake Engineering Research Centers Program of the National Science Foundation under Award number EEC-9701568. Additional support was provided by the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, through the CUREE-Kajima Phase IV Joint Research Program. Ray Young and John Machin of Ray Young & Associates provided the unit-cost estimates as well as valuable advice regarding cost-estimation practice. Alice Rissman of Rissman and Rissman Associates provided copyrights to the architectural and structural drawings. Carlos Rocha of Rocha Nueze & Associates met with the authors to discuss his seismic retrofit design for the demonstration building. The authors thank these individuals for their contribution.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
NSF Earthquake Engineering Research Centers ProgramEEC-9701568
Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake EngineeringUNSPECIFIED
Series Name:PEER Report
Issue or Number:2002/0
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20120919-152723083
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20120919-152723083
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:34235
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Carmen Nemer-Sirois
Deposited On:20 Sep 2012 21:39
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 04:17

Repository Staff Only: item control page