A Caltech Library Service

Constraints on the Structure of Mantle Convection Using Seismic Observations, Flow Models, and the Geoid

Hager, Bradford H. and Clayton, Robert W. (1989) Constraints on the Structure of Mantle Convection Using Seismic Observations, Flow Models, and the Geoid. In: Mantle Convection: Plate Tectonics and Global Dynamics. Fluid Mechanics of Astrophysics and Geophysics. No.4. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers , New York, pp. 657-763. ISBN 9780677221205.

Full text is not posted in this repository.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item:


The establishment of the theory of plate tectonics in the late 1960s has left little doubt that the mantle is convecting. The plates themselves form the cold upper thermal boundary layer of the mantle convection system; the cooling of oceanic plates as they move away from midoceanic ridges provides the mechanism by which the Earth loses most of its heat (e.g., Sclater et al., 1980; O'Connell and Hager, 1980). The mantle is in turn cooled by the cold slabs that plunge into Earth's interior at subduction zones. Although plate tectonics implies that convective motions in the mantle are the dominant mechanism for heat transport, and we can measure the surface motions associated with it, we are remarkably ignorant of even the gross features of the interior flow field associated with this mantle circulation. Only at subduction zones, where seismicity presumably marks the particle trajectories of the cold descending boundary layer, do we have direct evidence for the interior flow pattern and state of stress. Most of what is understood, or thought to be understood, about convection in the Earth's interior is based on comparison of simplified models to observations taken at the surface. Examples of these models of mantle convection are given in the other chapters of this book, as well as in the general geophysical literature. These include studies of convection in media with uniform rheology (Busse, this volume; Jarvis and Peltier, this volume), interpretation of travel time anomalies from deep earthquakes in terms of simple thermal models of subducted slabs (Jordan eta!., this volume), interpretation of geochemical anomalies in terms of models of the distribution of mantle heterogeneities (Hart and Zindler, this volume), and interpretation of changes in the Earth's shape and rotational parameters in terms of models of mantle rheology (Peltier, this volume). In order to be useful, models must be simple enough to understand, and yet contain enough of the essential physics to be applicable. The line between oversimplification and overwhelming complexity is a fine one, and its positioning is a matter of subjective judgement, particularly when some observations have a fairly small signal to noise ratio. The ultimate test of a particular model is whether it can satisfy, within their uncertainties, the observations. If it cannot it must be rejected, although unfortunately, the converse is not true. The more types of observations a model can satisfy, however, the more likely it is to be correct.

Item Type:Book Section
Hager, Bradford H.0000-0002-5643-1374
Clayton, Robert W.0000-0003-3323-3508
Additional Information:© 1989 Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. The research reported in this chapter was supported by NASA contract NAG5-315 and NSF contract EAR-8351371 and by a Sloan Foundation Fellowship to Bradford H. Hager. The graphics were made possible in part by a grant from the W.M. Keck Foundation. We would like to specifically acknowledge the valuable contributions of Robert P. Comer and Mark A. Richards, who played central roles in the research reviewed here. Encouragement and valuable reviews of the manuscript were provided by Richard J. O'Connell and Walter Kiefer. Contribution number 4342, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. An updated summary of further progress in this area in the over two years since this paper was completed can be found in Hager and Richards (1989).
Group:Seismological Laboratory
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Alfred P. Sloan FoundationUNSPECIFIED
W. M. Keck FoundationUNSPECIFIED
Other Numbering System:
Other Numbering System NameOther Numbering System ID
Caltech Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences4342
Series Name:Fluid Mechanics of Astrophysics and Geophysics
Issue or Number:4
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20121002-141328164
Persistent URL:
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:34637
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:03 Oct 2012 15:19
Last Modified:09 Mar 2020 13:18

Repository Staff Only: item control page