CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Analysis of hydrogen and fluorine in pyroxenes: I. Orthopyroxene

Mosenfelder, Jed L. and Rossman, George R. (2013) Analysis of hydrogen and fluorine in pyroxenes: I. Orthopyroxene. American Mineralogist, 98 (5-6). pp. 1026-1041. ISSN 0003-004X. doi:10.2138/am.2013.4291. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130711-104552905

Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130711-104552905

Abstract

Pyroxenes have the capacity to incorporate both hydrogen and fluorine in their structures, and accurate measurement of these volatile elements can be used to constrain geophysical and petrologic processes in planetary bodies. For example, pyroxenes may be used to constrain the volatile contents of melts from which they crystallized. However, the experimental determination of H and F in pyroxenes is difficult, particularly at the relatively low levels present in natural samples. Here we evaluate methods for determining both H and F in orthopyroxene. We measured trace concentrations of H (~40–400 ppm H2O) and F (<1–17 ppm) in a suite of nine orthopyroxenes from varying geological environments, using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The SIMS data for H (measured as ^(16)O^(1)H, referenced to 30Si and ^(18)O) are cross calibrated against Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, in turn calibrated against either manometry (Bell et al. 1995) or the frequency-dependent molar absorption coefficient derived by Libowitzky and Rossman (1997). Despite the fact that our samples exhibit a wide range of IR band structures, with varying percentages of absorbance split among low (2600–3350 cm^(−1)) and high (3350–3700 cm^(−1)) wavenumber bands, the SIMS data are fit with the same precision and virtually the same regression slope regardless of which IR calibration is used. We also confirm previous suggestions that the matrix effect for SIMS analyses between orthopyroxene and olivine is small (≤20%). Anomalously high yields of ^(16)O^(1)H in some analyses can be attributed to the presence of amphibole lamellae, and these analyses must be filtered out with different criteria than for olivine due to differences in the geometrical relationship of host to inclusion. For F, our derived values are highly dependent on analytical uncertainties related to the use of silicate glasses as standards. Regardless of the accuracy of our calibration, we see systematic differences in F concentrations in orthopyroxenes and olivines depending on their geological context. Samples derived from crustal environments and from Colorado Plateau minette diatremes have very low F (≤3 ppm), while higher contents can be found in megacrysts from South African kimberlites (up to 17 ppm in orthopyroxene and 47 ppm in olivine) and in xenocrysts from the Rio Grande Rift (Kilbourne Hole, 7–9 ppm in orthopyroxene).


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.2138/am.2013.4291DOIUNSPECIFIED
http://ammin.geoscienceworld.org/content/98/5-6/1026PublisherUNSPECIFIED
http://ammin.geoscienceworld.org/content/98/5-6/1026/suppl/DC1Related ItemUNSPECIFIED
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Rossman, George R.0000-0002-4571-6884
Additional Information:© 2013 Mineralogical Society of America. Manuscript received July 10, 2012; manuscript accepted January 2, 2013; manuscript handled by Roland Stalder. We acknowledge funding to G.R.R. from NSF grant EAR-0947956 and the White Rose Foundation. The Caltech center for Microanalysis, partially supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore foundation, also provided some support for the SIMS analyses. We thank Yunbin Guan for assistance with the ion microprobe, Chi Ma for assistance with the electron microprobe, and John Beckett for assistance with the gas-mixing 1-atm furnace. Zachary Morgan donated the mineral separate used to make the ZM1opx-HT sample, and David Bell has kindly allowed continued use of samples from his dissertation work at Caltech. Discussions with Richard Hervig and Marion Le Voyer on the topic of fluorine measurements were enlightening and encouraging. Finally, we thank the associate editor (Roland Stalder) and an anonymous reviewer for their comments that helped greatly to clarify the manuscript.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
NSFEAR-0947956
White Rose FoundationUNSPECIFIED
Caltech Center for MicroanalysisUNSPECIFIED
Gordon and Betty Moore FoundationUNSPECIFIED
Subject Keywords:FTIR; SIMS; mantle; calibration; nominally anhydrous minerals
Issue or Number:5-6
DOI:10.2138/am.2013.4291
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20130711-104552905
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130711-104552905
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:39317
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jason Perez
Deposited On:11 Jul 2013 20:18
Last Modified:09 Nov 2021 23:44

Repository Staff Only: item control page