Flamming, Douglas (1992) Regression Options for Historians: Choosing Among OLS, Tobit, and Probit Models. Humanities Working Paper, 152. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130729-145410860
|
PDF
- Published Version
See Usage Policy. 1MB |
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130729-145410860
Abstract
Only a generation ago, it was almost unheard of for historians to use multivariate regression analyses to substantiate their arguments. And when historians did begin to utilize regression models in the early 1970s, the suitability of such methods for historical research was a matter of considerable debate. But today, although protests occasionally resurface, regression tables can be found in mainstream journals and well-received books, on topics ranging from the impact of the Counter Reformation in France to the dynamics of kinship in colonial New England to the nature of the Ku Klux Klan in Indiana.
Item Type: | Report or Paper (Working Paper) |
---|---|
Group: | Humanities Working Papers |
Series Name: | Humanities Working Paper |
Issue or Number: | 152 |
Record Number: | CaltechAUTHORS:20130729-145410860 |
Persistent URL: | https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20130729-145410860 |
Official Citation: | Flamming, Douglas. Regression Options for Historians: Choosing Among OLS, Tobit, and Probit Models. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, 1992. Humanities Working Paper, No. 152. |
Usage Policy: | No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided. |
ID Code: | 39634 |
Collection: | CaltechAUTHORS |
Deposited By: | Lindsay Cleary |
Deposited On: | 06 Sep 2013 21:03 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 05:09 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page