CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Indecision Theory: Weight of Evidence and Voting Behavior

Ghirardato, Paolo and Katz, Jonathan N. (2006) Indecision Theory: Weight of Evidence and Voting Behavior. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8 (3). pp. 379-399. ISSN 1097-3923. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140314-120456198

Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140314-120456198

Abstract

In this paper, we show how to incorporate weight of evidence, or ambiguity, into a model of voting behavior. We do so in the context of the turnout decision of instrumentally rational voters who differ in their perception of the ambiguity of the candidates’ policy positions. Ambiguity is reflected by the fact that the voter’s beliefs are given by a set of probabilities, each of which represents in the voter’s mind a different possible scenario. We show that a voter who is averse to ambiguity considers abstention strictly optimal when the candidates’ policy positions are both ambiguous and they are “ambiguity complements.” Abstaining is preferred since it is tantamount to mixing the prospects embodied by the two candidates, thus enabling the voter to “hedge” the candidates’ ambiguity.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00269.xDOIArticle
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00269.x/abstractPublisherArticle
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Katz, Jonathan N.0000-0002-5287-3503
Additional Information:© 2006 Blackwell Publishing, Inc. Received July 25, 2003; Accepted April 5, 2005. A more extended version of this paper, discussing some extensions of the model presented here, is available as Caltech Social Science Working Paper No. 1106R with the title “Indecision Theory: Quality of Information and Voting Behavior.” We are very grateful to Alessandro Lizzeri for many detailed comments, and to Doug Bernheim, Peter Bossaerts, Colin Camerer, Tim Feddersen, Michel Le Breton, Tom Palfrey, Ken Shotts, John Conley, and two referees, and to audiences at Caltech, UCLA, the Department of Political Science at UC-San Diego, the 1999 Wallis Conference on Political Economy, and the 2001 SITE Conference for helpful comments and discussion. Jonathan Katz thanks the John M. Olin Foundation for a Faculty Fellowship supporting his research. URLs: http://web.econ.unito.it/gma/ghiro.html and http://jkatz.caltech.edu.
Group:Social Science Working Papers
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
John M. Olin FoundationUNSPECIFIED
Other Numbering System:
Other Numbering System NameOther Numbering System ID
Social Science Working Paper1106
Issue or Number:3
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20140314-120456198
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140314-120456198
Official Citation:GHIRARDATO, P. and KATZ, J. N. (2006), Indecision Theory: Weight of Evidence and Voting Behavior. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 8: 379–399. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2006.00269.x
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:44330
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jonathan Katz
Deposited On:17 Mar 2014 16:03
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 06:16

Repository Staff Only: item control page