CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Opposition control within the resolvent analysis framework

Luhar, M. and Sharma, A. S. and McKeon, B. J. (2014) Opposition control within the resolvent analysis framework. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 749 . pp. 597-626. ISSN 0022-1120. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140725-153829494

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

1MB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140725-153829494

Abstract

This paper extends the resolvent analysis of McKeon & Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382) to consider flow control techniques that employ linear control laws, focusing on opposition control (Choi, Moin & Kim, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 262, 1994, pp. 75–110) as an example. Under this formulation, the velocity field for turbulent pipe flow is decomposed into a series of highly amplified (rank-1) response modes, identified from a gain analysis of the Fourier-transformed Navier– Stokes equations. These rank-1 velocity responses represent propagating structures of given streamwise/spanwise wavelength and temporal frequency, whose wall-normal footprint depends on the phase speed of the mode. Opposition control, introduced via the boundary condition on wall-normal velocity, affects the amplification characteristics (and wall-normal structure) of these response modes; a decrease in gain indicates mode suppression, which leads to a decrease in the drag contribution from that mode. With basic assumptions, this rank-1 model reproduces trends observed in previous direct numerical simulation and large eddy simulation, without requiring high-performance computing facilities. Further, a wavenumber–frequency breakdown of control explains the deterioration of opposition control performance with increasing sensor elevation and Reynolds number. It is shown that slower-moving modes localized near the wall (i.e. attached modes) are suppressed by opposition control. Faster-moving detached modes, which are more energetic at higher Reynolds number and more likely to be detected by sensors far from the wall, are further amplified. These faster-moving modes require a phase lag between sensor and actuator velocity for suppression. Thus, the effectiveness of opposition control is determined by a trade-off between the modes detected by the sensor. However, it may be possible to develop control strategies optimized for individual modes. A brief exploration of such mode-optimized control suggests the potential for significant performance improvement.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.209 DOIArticle
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9266992&fileId=S0022112014002092PublisherArticle
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Sharma, A. S.0000-0002-7170-1627
McKeon, B. J.0000-0003-4220-1583
Additional Information:© 2014 Cambridge University Press. (Received 20 September 2013; revised 12 February 2014; accepted 12 April 2014; first published online 19 May 2014) This material is based on work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award FA9550-12-1-0469 (program manager Dr Douglas Smith).
Group:GALCIT
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)FA9550-12-1-0469
Subject Keywords:drag reduction; turbulence control; turbulent boundary layers
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20140725-153829494
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140725-153829494
Official Citation:M. Luhar, A. S. Sharma and B. J. McKeon (2014). Opposition control within the resolvent analysis framework. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 749, pp 597-626 doi:10.1017/jfm.2014.209
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:47506
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:25 Jul 2014 22:58
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 06:54

Repository Staff Only: item control page