CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Source mechanism of the magnitude 7.2 Grand Banks earthquake of November 1929: Double couple or submarine landslide?

Hasegawa, H. S. and Kanamori, H. (1987) Source mechanism of the magnitude 7.2 Grand Banks earthquake of November 1929: Double couple or submarine landslide? Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 77 (6). pp. 1984-2004. ISSN 0037-1106. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140908-144531589

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

1276Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140908-144531589

Abstract

We have examined P, S, and surface waves derived from seismograms that we collected for the 1929 Grand Banks, Canada, earthquake. This event is noteworthy for the sediment slide and turbidity current that broke the trans-Atlantic cables and for its destructive tsunami. Both the surface-wave magnitude, M_S, and the body-wave magnitude, m_B, calculated from these seismograms are 7.2. Fault mechanisms previously suggested for this event include a NW-SE-striking strike-slip mechanism and an approximately E-W-striking thrust mechanism. In addition, because of the presence of an extensive area of slump and turbidity current, there exists the possibility that sediment slumping could also be a primary causative factor of this event. We tested these fault models and a horizontal single-force (oriented N5°W) model representing a sediment slide against our data. Among these models, only the single-force model is consistent with the P-, S-, and surface-wave data. Our data, however, do not preclude fault models which were not tested. From the spectral data of Love waves at a 50-sec period, we estimated the magnitude of the single force to be about 1.4 × 10^(20) dynes. From this value, we estimated the total volume of sedimentary slumping to be about 5.5 × 10^(11) m^3, which is approximately 5 times larger than a recent estimate of volume from in situ measurements. The difference in estimates of overall volume is likely due to a combination of the inherent difficulty in estimating accurately the displaced sediments from in situ measurements, and of inadequacy of the seismic model; or perhaps because not only the slump but also a tectonic earthquake could have been the cause of this event and contributed significantly to the waveforms studied.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://bssa.geoscienceworld.org/content/77/6/1984.abstractPublisherArticle
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Kanamori, H.0000-0001-8219-9428
Additional Information:© 1987 Seismological Society of America. Manuscript received 25 June 1986. We thank the many institutions that sent us requested copies of seismograms of this noteworthy historical earthquake. Comments on various aspects of this paper by the following are appreciated: J. Adams; R. J. Wetmiller; M. J. Berry; P. W. Basham; H. Eissler; and the reviewers. We thank D. J. W. Piper for sending us preprints of two of his papers. Discussions with A. Ruffman on complexities of sediment slumping were helpful. This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation Grant ECE-8303647.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
NSFECE-8303647
Other Numbering System:
Other Numbering System NameOther Numbering System ID
Caltech Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences4456
Issue or Number:6
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20140908-144531589
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140908-144531589
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:49355
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:08 Sep 2014 23:41
Last Modified:09 Mar 2020 13:18

Repository Staff Only: item control page