CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project

Middlebrook, Ann M. and Murphy, Daniel M. and Lee, Shan-Hu and Thomson, David S. and Prather, Kimberly A. and Wenzel, Ryan J. and Liu, Don-Yuan and Phares, Denis J. and Rhoads, Kevin P. and Wexler, Anthony S. and Johnston, Murray V. and Jimenez, Jose L. and Jayne, John T. and Worsnop, Douglas R. and Yourshaw, Ivan and Seinfeld, John H. and Flagan, Richard C. (2003) A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project. Journal of Geophysical Research D, 108 (D7). Art. No. 8424. ISSN 0148-0227. doi:10.1029/2001JD000660. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141029-145943020

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

485kB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141029-145943020

Abstract

During the Atlanta Supersite Project, four particle mass spectrometers were operated together for the first time: NOAA's Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometer (PALMS), University of California at Riverside's Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (ATOFMS), University of Delaware's Rapid Single-Particle Mass Spectrometer II (RSMS-II), and Aerodyne's Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (AMS). Although these mass spectrometers are generally classified as similar instruments, they clearly have different characteristics due to their unique designs. One primary difference is related to the volatilization/ionization method: PALMS, ATOFMS, and RSMS-II utilize laser desorption/ionization, whereas particles in the AMS instrument are volatilized by impaction onto a heated surface with the resulting components ionized by electron impact. Thus mass spectral data from the AMS are representative of the ensemble of particles sampled, and those from the laser-based instruments are representative of individual particles. In addition, the AMS instrument cannot analyze refractory material such as soot, sodium chloride, and crustal elements, and some sulfate or water-rich particles may not always be analyzed with every laser-based instrument. A main difference among the laser-based mass spectrometers is that the RSMS-II instrument can obtain size-resolved single particle composition information for particles with aerodynamic diameters as small as 15 nm. The minimum sizes analyzed by ATOFMS and PALMS are 0.2 and about 0.35 μm, respectively, in aerodynamic diameter. Furthermore, PALMS, ATOFMS, and RSMS-II use different laser ionization conditions. Despite these differences the laser-based instruments found similar individual particle classifications, and their relative fractions among comparable sized particles from Atlanta were broadly consistent. Finally, the AMS measurements of the nitrate/sulfate mole ratio were highly correlated with composite measurements (r^2 = 0.93). In contrast, the PALMS nitrate/sulfate ion ratios were only moderately correlated (r^2 ∼ 0.7).


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000660 DOIArticle
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2001JD000660/abstractPublisherArticle
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Jimenez, Jose L.0000-0001-6203-1847
Worsnop, Douglas R.0000-0002-8928-8017
Seinfeld, John H.0000-0003-1344-4068
Flagan, Richard C.0000-0001-5690-770X
Additional Information:© 2003 by the American Geophysical Union. Received 23 March 2001; revised 31 January 2002; accepted 5 February 2002; published 10 April 2003. We thank Eric Edgerton (ARA) for assisting with the logistics of bringing the four instruments together in Atlanta. Deborah Gross, Alex Barron, and Ben Warren (Carleton College) and Rebecca Washenfelder (CalTech) are gratefully acknowledged for their assistance with acquiring data. We also thank Susanne Hering (ADI) for the composite measurements of sulfate and nitrate as well as Peter McMurry (UMinn) for the particle density data. This work was funded in part by the U. S. EPA, NARSTO (Southern Oxidants Study), and Georgia Institute of Technology (SCISSAP).
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)UNSPECIFIED
NARSTOUNSPECIFIED
Georgia Institute of TechnologyUNSPECIFIED
Subject Keywords:aerosol, mass spectrometer, single particle composition
Issue or Number:D7
Classification Code:0305 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801); 0345 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Pollution—urban and regional (0305); 0394 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Instruments and Techniques
DOI:10.1029/2001JD000660
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20141029-145943020
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141029-145943020
Official Citation:Middlebrook, A. M., et al., A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D7), 8424, doi:10.1029/2001JD000660, 2003
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:51031
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:29 Oct 2014 22:52
Last Modified:10 Nov 2021 19:04

Repository Staff Only: item control page