Schapery, R. A. (1961) Two Simple Approximate Methods of Laplace Transform Inversion for Viscoelastic Stress Analysis. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. (Unpublished) http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141114114344034

PDF
 Submitted Version
See Usage Policy. 1090Kb 
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141114114344034
Abstract
Two approximate methods of Laplace transform inversion are given which are simple to use and are particularly applicable to stress analysis problems in quasistatic linear viscoelasticity. Once an associated elastic solution is known numerically or analytically, the timedependent viscoelastic response can be easily calculated using realistic material properties, regardless of how complex the property dependence of the elastic solution may be. The new feature of these methods is that it is necessary to know only 1) an elastic solution numerically for certain ranges of elastic constants and 2) numerical values of the operational moduli or compliances for real, positive values of the transform parameter. One method utilizes a mathematical property of the Laplace transform, while the other is based on some results obtained from Irreversible Thermodynamics and variational principles. Because of this, they are quite general and can be used with anisotropic and inhomogeneous materials. Two numerical examples are given: As the first one, we calculate the timedependent strain in a long, internally. pressurized cylinder with an elastic case. The second example consists of inverting a transform which was derived by Muki and Sternberg in the thermoviscoelastic analysis of a slab and a sphere(1). Both methods were found to provide results which are within the usual engineering requirements of accuracy. Application of the approximate methods to problems in dynamic viscoelasticity is discussed briefly. Supplementing the stress analysis, two techniques for calculating operational moduli and compliances from experimental stressstrain data are discussed and applied. Both can be used with creep, relaxation, and steadystate oscillation data. The most direct one consists of numerically integrating experimental data, while the other is a modelfitting scheme. With this latter method finiteelement spring and dashpot models are readily found which fit the entire response.curves. In using these methods to calculate the operational functions employed in the stress analysis examples, we found that modelfitting was the fastest of the two, yet was very accurate.
Item Type:  Report or Paper (Technical Report)  

Additional Information:  © 1961 California Institute of Technology. Portions of this work were sponsored by the Mechanics Branch, Aeronautical Research Laboratory Wright Air Development Division Contract No. AF 33(616)8399, GALCIT 119.  
Group:  Graduate Aeronautical Laboratories (Solid Mechanics)  
Funders: 
 
Other Numbering System: 
 
Record Number:  CaltechAUTHORS:20141114114344034  
Persistent URL:  http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20141114114344034  
Usage Policy:  No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.  
ID Code:  51777  
Collection:  CaltechAUTHORS  
Deposited By:  Kristin Buxton  
Deposited On:  14 Nov 2014 21:56  
Last Modified:  14 Nov 2014 21:56 
Repository Staff Only: item control page