CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

A Biologically Plausible Computational Theory for Value Integration and Action Selection in Decisions with Competing Alternatives

Christopoulos, Vassilios and Bonaiuto, James and Andersen, Richard A. (2015) A Biologically Plausible Computational Theory for Value Integration and Action Selection in Decisions with Competing Alternatives. PLoS Computational Biology, 11 (3). Art. No. e1004104. ISSN 1553-734X. PMCID PMC4372613. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20150501-143501387

[img] PDF - Published Version
Creative Commons Attribution.

2496Kb
[img] Image (TIFF) (Figure S1) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

900Kb
[img] Image (TIFF) (Figure S2) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

417Kb
[img] PDF (S1 Text. Stochastic optimal control theory) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

165Kb
[img] PDF (S1 Table. Model parameters) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

43Kb
[img] PDF (S2 Table. Stimulus input field parameters) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

37Kb
[img] PDF (S3 Table. Expected reward field parameters) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

37Kb
[img] PDF (S4 Table. Motor plan formation field parameters) - Supplemental Material
Creative Commons Attribution.

37Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20150501-143501387

Abstract

Decision making is a vital component of human and animal behavior that involves selecting between alternative options and generating actions to implement the choices. Although decisions can be as simple as choosing a goal and then pursuing it, humans and animals usually have to make decisions in dynamic environments where the value and the availability of an option change unpredictably with time and previous actions. A predator chasing multiple prey exemplifies how goals can dynamically change and compete during ongoing actions. Classical psychological theories posit that decision making takes place within frontal areas and is a separate process from perception and action. However, recent findings argue for additional mechanisms and suggest the decisions between actions often emerge through a continuous competition within the same brain regions that plan and guide action execution. According to these findings, the sensorimotor system generates concurrent action-plans for competing goals and uses online information to bias the competition until a single goal is pursued. This information is diverse, relating to both the dynamic value of the goal and the cost of acting, creating a challenging problem in integrating information across these diverse variables in real time. We introduce a computational framework for dynamically integrating value information from disparate sources in decision tasks with competing actions. We evaluated the framework in a series of oculomotor and reaching decision tasks and found that it captures many features of choice/motor behavior, as well as its neural underpinnings that previously have eluded a common explanation.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004104 DOIArticle
http://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004104PublisherArticle
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4372613/PubMed CentralArticle
Additional Information:© 2015 Christopoulos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Received: September 25, 2014; Accepted: December 29, 2014; Published: March 24, 2015. Funding: This work was funded by NIH: R01EY007492, P50MH942581A, Sloan-Swartz fellowship for computational neuroscience: 2012–9, DARPA: REPAIR project. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Author Contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: VC JB RAA. Performed the experiments: VC JB. Analyzed the data: VC JB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VC JB. Wrote the paper: VC JB RAA. Model design and development: VC JB.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
NIHR01EY007492
NIHP50MH942581A
Sloan-Swartz FellowshipUNSPECIFIED
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)UNSPECIFIED
Issue or Number:3
PubMed Central ID:PMC4372613
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20150501-143501387
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20150501-143501387
Official Citation:Christopoulos V, Bonaiuto J, Andersen RA (2015) A Biologically Plausible Computational Theory for Value Integration and Action Selection in Decisions with Competing Alternatives. PLoS Comput Biol 11(3): e1004104. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004104
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:57166
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:01 May 2015 22:10
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 08:21

Repository Staff Only: item control page