Sinsheimer, Robert L. and Piel, Gerard (1976) Inquiring into Inquiry: Two Opposing Views. Hastings Center Report, 6 (4). pp. 18-19. ISSN 0093-0334. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20151118-090100735
Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20151118-090100735
Abstract
For what specific purposes might we wish to limit inquiry? Do we wish to curb only the means or even the ends of inquiry? Let me advance some suggestions. One is the preservation of human dignity. We should not do experiments that involuntarily make of man a means rather than an end. The ethics of human experimentation are, I think, now rather well accepted, even though it must be recognized that such restraints blunt pure inquiry.
| Item Type: | Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Related URLs: |
| ||||||
| Additional Information: | © 1976 The Hastings Center. | ||||||
| Issue or Number: | 4 | ||||||
| Record Number: | CaltechAUTHORS:20151118-090100735 | ||||||
| Persistent URL: | https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20151118-090100735 | ||||||
| Official Citation: | Sinsheimer, Robert L., and Gerard Piel. “Inquiring into Inquiry: Two Opposing Views”. The Hastings Center Report 6.4 (1976): 18–19 | ||||||
| Usage Policy: | No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided. | ||||||
| ID Code: | 62190 | ||||||
| Collection: | CaltechAUTHORS | ||||||
| Deposited By: | Tony Diaz | ||||||
| Deposited On: | 18 Nov 2015 19:21 | ||||||
| Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 09:16 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page
