CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Economic Retrospective Voting and Incentives for Policymaking

Kiewiet, D. Roderick (2000) Economic Retrospective Voting and Incentives for Policymaking. Electoral Studies, 10 (2-3). pp. 427-444. ISSN 0261-3794. http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20160218-105113156

Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20160218-105113156

Abstract

This paper explores the possibility that the punishment–reward strategy known as economic retrospective voting provides incentives to pursue good economic policies. By “good” we mean policies that enhance efficiency and reduce economic rents. The key hypothesis is that in those countries whose electoral arrangements and governing institutions yield high clarity of responsibility, a resultant high level of retrospective voting should compel incumbent parties to be more vigorous in the pursuit of efficiency-enhancing policies, or at least less vigorous in creating rents. In countries where the clarity of responsibility is low, the more tenuous linkage between economic performance and electoral success should leave incumbent governments less motivated to promote efficiency and to eliminate rents. As hypothesized, countries low in clarity of responsibility appear to be more inclined to subject their economies to over-regulation and to engage in higher levels of transfers and subsidies. On several other policy dimensions, however, there were no discernable differences between high and low clarity of responsibility countries.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00060-8DOIArticle
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261379499000608PublisherArticle
http://www.transparency.org/research/cpi/overviewOrganizationCorruption Transparency Index
Additional Information:© 2000 Elsevier. An earlier version of this paper was delivered at the Conference on Economics and Elections: Comparisons and Conclusions, Sandbjerg, Denmark, 23–26 August 1998. I would like to thank Mike Alvarez, Frank Baumgartner, Sam Kernell, John Ledyard, Michael Lewis-Beck, Lynn Maurer, Donald Wittman, and especially Martin Paldam for their comments and criticisms.
Group:Social Science Working Papers
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20160218-105113156
Persistent URL:http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20160218-105113156
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:64551
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Susan Vite
Deposited On:02 Mar 2016 00:16
Last Modified:02 Mar 2016 00:16

Repository Staff Only: item control page