A Caltech Library Service

“Experimental Philosophy”: Invention and Rebirth of a Seventeenth-Century Concept

Feingold, Mordechai (2016) “Experimental Philosophy”: Invention and Rebirth of a Seventeenth-Century Concept. Early Science and Medicine, 21 (1). pp. 1-28. ISSN 1383-7427. doi:10.1163/15733823-00211P01.

Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item:


This essay offers a more dynamic, and historically grounded, context to explain how and why various individuals and groups in England adopted the term “experimental philosophy.” Before the foundation of the Royal Society, I contend, the term had been utilized promiscuously, its modern signification conspicuously absent. Building on this insight, I examine the seemingly deliberate decision by future members of the Royal Society to avoid using the term – and the subsequent shift in their attitude c. 1660. My aim is to demonstrate that while only in England did the fixed conceptual and polemical term “experimental philosophy” become popularized and its (supposed) practice institutionalized, English natural philosophers did not view themselves as engaged in a practice that was fundamentally different than that pursued by their counterparts on the Continent.

Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription DOIArticle
Additional Information:© 2016 Koninklijke Brill NV.
Subject Keywords:Experimental Philosophy; Robert Boyle; Royal Society; Hartlib Circle; Francis Bacon; Isaac Newton

Issue or Number:1
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20160317-100410171
Persistent URL:
Official Citation:“Experimental Philosophy”: Invention and Rebirth of a Seventeenth-Century Concept
 Feingold, Mordechai, Early Science and Medicine, 21, 1-28 (2016), DOI:
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:65420
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:17 Mar 2016 19:58
Last Modified:10 Nov 2021 23:45

Repository Staff Only: item control page