CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy

Shaner, Matthew R. and Atwater, Harry A. and Lewis, Nathan S. and McFarland, Eric W. (2016) A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy. Energy and Environmental Science, 9 (7). pp. 2354-2371. ISSN 1754-5692. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20160610-132918453

[img] PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

2943Kb
[img] PDF - Supplemental Material
See Usage Policy.

317Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20160610-132918453

Abstract

A technoeconomic analysis of photoelectrochemical (PEC) and photovoltaic-electrolytic (PV-E) solar-hydrogen production of 10 000 kg H_2 day^(−1) (3.65 kilotons per year) was performed to assess the economics of each technology, and to provide a basis for comparison between these technologies as well as within the broader energy landscape. Two PEC systems, differentiated primarily by the extent of solar concentration (unconcentrated and 10× concentrated) and two PV-E systems, differentiated by the degree of grid connectivity (unconnected and grid supplemented), were analyzed. In each case, a base-case system that used established designs and materials was compared to prospective systems that might be envisioned and developed in the future with the goal of achieving substantially lower overall system costs. With identical overall plant efficiencies of 9.8%, the unconcentrated PEC and non-grid connected PV-E system base-case capital expenses for the rated capacity of 3.65 kilotons H_2 per year were $205 MM ($293 per m^2 of solar collection area (m_S^(−2)), $14.7 W_(H2,P)^(−1)) and $260 MM ($371 m_S^(−2), $18.8 W_(H2,P)^(−1)), respectively. The untaxed, plant-gate levelized costs for the hydrogen product (LCH) were $11.4 kg^(−1) and $12.1 kg^(−1) for the base-case PEC and PV-E systems, respectively. The 10× concentrated PEC base-case system capital cost was $160 MM ($428 m_S^(−2), $11.5 W_(H2,P)^(−1)) and for an efficiency of 20% the LCH was $9.2 kg^(−1). Likewise, the grid supplemented base-case PV-E system capital cost was $66 MM ($441 m_S^(−2), $11.5 W_(H2,P)^(−1)), and with solar-to-hydrogen and grid electrolysis system efficiencies of 9.8% and 61%, respectively, the LCH was $6.1 kg^(−1). As a benchmark, a proton-exchange membrane (PEM) based grid-connected electrolysis system was analyzed. Assuming a system efficiency of 61% and a grid electricity cost of $0.07 kWh^(−1), the LCH was $5.5 kg^(−1). A sensitivity analysis indicated that, relative to the base-case, increases in the system efficiency could effect the greatest cost reductions for all systems, due to the areal dependencies of many of the components. The balance-of-systems (BoS) costs were the largest factor in differentiating the PEC and PV-E systems. No single or combination of technical advancements based on currently demonstrated technology can provide sufficient cost reductions to allow solar hydrogen to directly compete on a levelized cost basis with hydrogen produced from fossil energy. Specifically, a cost of CO_2 greater than ∼$800 (ton CO_2)^(−1) was estimated to be necessary for base-case PEC hydrogen to reach price parity with hydrogen derived from steam reforming of methane priced at $12 GJ^(−1) ($1.39 (kg H_2)^(−1)). A comparison with low CO_2 and CO_2-neutral energy sources indicated that base-case PEC hydrogen is not currently cost-competitive with electrolysis using electricity supplied by nuclear power or from fossil-fuels in conjunction with carbon capture and storage. Solar electricity production and storage using either batteries or PEC hydrogen technologies are currently an order of magnitude greater in cost than electricity prices with no clear advantage to either battery or hydrogen storage as of yet. Significant advances in PEC technology performance and system cost reductions are necessary to enable cost-effective PEC-derived solar hydrogen for use in scalable grid-storage applications as well as for use as a chemical feedstock precursor to CO_2-neutral high energy-density transportation fuels. Hence such applications are an opportunity for foundational research to contribute to the development of disruptive approaches to solar fuels generation systems that can offer higher performance at much lower cost than is provided by current embodiments of solar fuels generators. Efforts to directly reduce CO_2 photoelectrochemically or electrochemically could potentially produce products with higher value than hydrogen, but many, as yet unmet, challenges include catalytic efficiency and selectivity, and CO_2 mass transport rates and feedstock cost. Major breakthroughs are required to obtain viable economic costs for solar hydrogen production, but the barriers to achieve cost-competitiveness with existing large-scale thermochemical processes for CO_2 reduction are even greater.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5ee02573gDOIArticle
http://pubs.rsc.org/en/Content/ArticleLanding/2016/EE/C5EE02573GPublisherArticle
http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/c5/ee/c5ee02573g/c5ee02573g1.pdfPublisherSupplementary Information
ORCID:
AuthorORCID
Shaner, Matthew R.0000-0003-4682-9757
Atwater, Harry A.0000-0001-9435-0201
Lewis, Nathan S.0000-0001-5245-0538
Additional Information:© 2016 Royal Society of Chemistry. Received 19 Aug 2015, Accepted 05 May 2016, First published online 26 May 2016. This material is based upon work performed by the Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, a DOE Energy Innovation Hub, supported through the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Award Number DE-SC0004993. Support for this technoeconomic analysis was provided jointly by the Dow Centre for Sustainable Engineering Innovation at the University of Queensland, and the Resnick Institute for Sustainability at Caltech.
Group:Resnick Sustainability Institute, JCAP
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Department of Energy (DOE)DE-SC0004993
University of QueenslandUNSPECIFIED
Resnick Sustainability InstituteUNSPECIFIED
Issue or Number:7
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20160610-132918453
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20160610-132918453
Official Citation:A comparative technoeconomic analysis of renewable hydrogen production using solar energy Matthew R. Shaner, Harry A. Atwater, Nathan S. Lewis and Eric W. McFarland Energy Environ. Sci., 2016,9, 2354-2371 DOI: 10.1039/C5EE02573G
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:67844
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:10 Jun 2016 20:44
Last Modified:09 Oct 2019 03:48

Repository Staff Only: item control page