CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Comparison of Three-Phase Modulation with Two-Phase and Four-Phase Modulation

Pierce, J. R. (1980) Comparison of Three-Phase Modulation with Two-Phase and Four-Phase Modulation. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 28 (7). pp. 1098-1099. ISSN 0096-2244. doi:10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094757. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170802-162109675

[img] PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

210kB

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170802-162109675

Abstract

For a constant added noise density at high signal-to-noise ratios and for the same error rate, three-phase PSK requires about 0.75 dB less energy per bit than two-phase or four-phase PSK. However, at very low signal-to-noise ratios, three-phase PSK requires about 0.74 dB more energy per bit of channel capacity than two-phase or four-phase PSK.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094757DOIArticle
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1094757/PublisherArticle
Additional Information:© 1980 IEEE. Paper approved by the Editor for Data Communication Systems of the IEEE Communications Society for publication without oral presentation. Manuscript received December 27, 1978; revised March 3, 1980.
Issue or Number:7
DOI:10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094757
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20170802-162109675
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170802-162109675
Official Citation:J. Pierce, "Comparison of Three-Phase Modulation with Two-Phase and Four-Phase Modulation," in IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1098-1099, Jul 1980. doi: 10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094757
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:79796
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By:INVALID USER
Deposited On:02 Aug 2017 23:38
Last Modified:15 Nov 2021 17:50

Repository Staff Only: item control page