CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence

Grether, David M. (1990) Testing Bayes Rule and the Representativeness Heuristic: Some Experimental Evidence. Social Science Working Paper, 724. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. (Unpublished) https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170901-141503191

[img] PDF (sswp 724 - Apr. 1990) - Submitted Version
See Usage Policy.

803Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170901-141503191

Abstract

The psychological literature has identified a number of heuristics which individuals may use in making judgments or choices under uncertainty. Mathematically equivalent problems may be treated differently depending upon details of the decision setting (Gigerenzer et al. (1988), Hinz et al. (1988), Birnbaum and Mellers (1983), Ginossar and Trope (1987)) or upon how the decisions are framed (Tversky and Kahneman (1986)). The results presented in this paper are consistent with those findings and are unsettling. In equivalent problems subjects appear to adopt different strategies in response to observing different data. All problems were inference problems about populations represented by bingo cages and all randomization was operational and observed by the subjects. Thus one cannot explain the change of decision strategy by appeal to changing reference points nor should difference between surface and deep structure of problems apply (Wagenaar et al. (1988)). A striking observation from the experiments is the result of employing financial incentives. Some experiments included financial incentives for accuracy and some did not. In the latter experiments the number of nonsense or incoherent responses increased by a factor of three. The majority of subjects in both treatments behaved reasonably, but of those lacking financial incentives a larger proportion gave obviously absurd responses. This suggests that data from decision experiments in which no financial incentives were should be treated as possibly contaminated and statistical methods robust against outliers employed.


Item Type:Report or Paper (Working Paper)
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170906-070006950Related ItemPublished Version
Additional Information:Support of the National Science Foundation is gratefully acknowledged. The author thanks several colleagues especially Charles R. Plott for helpful comments. Published as Grether, David M. "Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 17, no. 1 (1992): 31-57.
Group:Social Science Working Papers
Series Name:Social Science Working Paper
Issue or Number:724
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20170901-141503191
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170901-141503191
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:81091
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jacquelyn Bussone
Deposited On:05 Sep 2017 23:47
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 18:38

Repository Staff Only: item control page