CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Litigation of Settlement Demands Questioned by Bayesian Defendants

Salant, Stephen W. (1984) Litigation of Settlement Demands Questioned by Bayesian Defendants. Social Science Working Paper, 516. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. (Unpublished) https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170920-135310836

[img] PDF (sswp 516 - Mar. 1984) - Submitted Version
See Usage Policy.

908Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170920-135310836

Abstract

This paper analyzes a stylized model of pretrial settlement negotiations in a personal-injury case. It is assumed that the prospective plaintiff knows the severity of his injury but that the prospective defendant has incomplete information. As a result of this information asymmetry a proportion of slightly-injured plaintiffs are tempted to inflate their settlement demands and a proportion of such demands are rejected by suspicious defendants. By analogy with other models of adverse selection (e. g., Rothschild-Stiglitz (1976)), the presence of slightly-injured plaintiffs imposes a negative externality on plaintiffs with genuine severe injuries since defendant s cannot identify the severely-injured and sometimes reject their reasonable demands, forcing them into costly litigation. A filing fee imposed on minor claims is shown to displace the equilibrium but, paradoxically, to cause an increase in the frequency of litigation. This model differs from recent contributions to the literature on pretrial negotiations under incomplete information. Unlike P'ng (1983) and Bebchuk (1983), the uninformed litigant in this model learns from the observed equilibrium behavior of the informed litigant. Unlike Ordover-Rubinstein (1983) and Salant-Rest (1982), settlement demands are endogenous.


Item Type:Report or Paper (Working Paper)
Additional Information:This paper extends the analysis in Salant and Rest (1982) by relaxing its restriction that plaintiffs must make one of two exogenous settlement demands. I would like to thank Gregory Rest for his collaboration in the earlier research effort. I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to Jonathan Cave for his many helpful suggestions.
Group:Social Science Working Papers
Series Name:Social Science Working Paper
Issue or Number:516
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20170920-135310836
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170920-135310836
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:81628
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jacquelyn Bussone
Deposited On:20 Sep 2017 21:01
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 18:45

Repository Staff Only: item control page