CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Turbulence, Cost Escalation and Capital Intensity Bias in Defense Contracting

Terasawa, Katsuaki and Quirk, James and Womer, Keith (1989) Turbulence, Cost Escalation and Capital Intensity Bias in Defense Contracting. In: Cost Analysis Applications of Economics and Operations Research. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. No.332. Springer , New York, NY, pp. 97-116. ISBN 978-0-387-97048-6. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171002-104640854

[img] PDF (sswp 508 - published) - Published Version
Restricted to Caltech community only
See Usage Policy.

3297Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171002-104640854

Abstract

The recent growth of defense expenditures has once more raised public concern about cost overruns on defense contractors. Economists have pointed out that cost overruns are not necessarily bad per se; instead, attention should be directed to the question as to whether the procurement policies of the Department of Defense (DoD) satisfy the criterion of economic efficiency (see Peck and Sherer (1962)). In connection with this, applications of the principal-agent model to defense contracting show that not only do cost plus fixed fee (CPFF) contracts create moral hazard problems, but that in fact so long as contractors are risk averse and perfect monitoring of their activities is not possible, inefficiencies will arise whatever the form of the contract employed in DoD procurement (see Ross (1973), Harris and Raviv (1979), and Weitzman (1980)). It has been suggested that improvements in efficiency might be achieved if contracts more closely resembling Arrow-Debreu contingent claims were employed (see Cummins (1977)), but this raises problems of manipulation of the probabilities of occurrence of the relevant states of the world. Looking at the problem of cost escalation from a completely different point of view, biases might be introduced into cost comparisons and into decision making with respect to risky projects simply because of the methodology by cost estimators (see Quirk and Terasawa (1983)).


Item Type:Book Section
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6384-2_6DOIArticle
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4684-6384-2_6PublisherArticle
http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170920-153210299Related ItemWorking Paper
Additional Information:© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
Series Name:Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems
Issue or Number:332
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20171002-104640854
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171002-104640854
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:81946
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:02 Oct 2017 18:02
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 18:49

Repository Staff Only: item control page