CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

On Comparative Dynamics

El-Hodiri, Mohamed M. and Quirk, James P. (1974) On Comparative Dynamics. Social Science Working Paper, 67. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. (Unpublished) https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171031-142930698

[img] PDF (sswp 67 - Nov. 1974) - Submitted Version
See Usage Policy.

632Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171031-142930698

Abstract

Lately, there has been an increased interest in stability of growth paths, see e.g., Brock and Scheinkman [1974]. The problem has been stated in terms of properties of stationary paths. In order to appreciate the difficulty of the general stability problem, one must realize that there are two types of "time" involved in the analysis: stability "time” and path “time.” Thus, the appropriate mathematical field is that of differential equations defined on a space of functions rather than a finite dimensional space. Naturally, if one restricts one’s attention to stationary paths, then the usual stability analysis is appropriate. However, we would be then discussing the asymptotic behavior of the asymptotic state of the economy. This note strives to put the problem of path stability in the proper perspective by discussing the much simpler problem of comparative dynamics. Unfortunately this term has been used in the economic growth literature to discuss the basically comparative statics problem of comparing stationary growth paths. By comparative dynamics, we mean the determination of the “direction” of change in the optimal path of decision variables due to a change in the exogenous variables. The traditional method of deriving comparative statics results has been to use second order conditions for optimality. However, if one is willing to assume concavity, these results could be derived in a more direct way by utilizing the fact that a differentiable concave function lies below its tangent plane. We shall use this concept in deriving the main inequalities of this note. By way of motivation, we first derive two inequalities of comparative statics. Then we derive the comparative dynamics results and finally we discuss some economic theoretical examples.


Item Type:Report or Paper (Working Paper)
Additional Information:Published in Government Policies and Technological Innovation, National Technical Information Service. National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C. 20550. Vol. III, p. 87-98, Research and Policy Studies, PB244573, 1974
Group:Social Science Working Papers
Series Name:Social Science Working Paper
Issue or Number:67
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20171031-142930698
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171031-142930698
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:82817
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jacquelyn Bussone
Deposited On:01 Nov 2017 16:47
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 18:59

Repository Staff Only: item control page