A Caltech Library Service

A simple direction model of electoral competition

Matthews, Steven A. (1979) A simple direction model of electoral competition. Public Choice, 34 (2). pp. 141-156. ISSN 0048-5829. doi:10.1007/BF00129523.

[img] PDF (sswp 128 - published) - Published Version
Restricted to Caltech community only
See Usage Policy.


Use this Persistent URL to link to this item:


The direction model of the electoral process allows limits to candidate mobility or voter perception and cognition. It is applicable (1) if only issue outcomes near the status quo are associated with candidates; (2) if only directional information is transmitted to voters; (3) if voter preferences are only well-defined near the status quo or are only defined for directions in which it can shift; or (4) if the outcome space is curved so that it can be modeled as a hypersphere. Assuming that a voter will vote for the candidate who campaigns for a direction closest to his own preferred direction, plurality equilibria were shown to be undominated. Equilibrium and undominated directions were shown to be indentical if nobody is totally indifferent. Then a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of undominated directions was determined. The first part of the condition, stating that any hyperplane containing the undominated direction vector and the origin bisects the distribution of preferred directions, is analogous to the total median condition in the simple Euclidean models. The remainder of the condition in Theorem 2, stating that a majority of the electorate's preferred direction vectors lie on the same side as the undominated direction vector of any hyperplane containing the origin, is not implied by the median-like property in this model because of the ‘curved’ nature of the directional domain space. The second part of the condition is what allows a candidate to diverge from a fixed direction chosen by an extremist opponent, where at least half the feasible directions are defined to be extremist for every distribution of the electorates' preferred directions. Although the addition of a second part to the characterizing condition for equilibrium seems to further decrease the likelihood of its occurrence, it was shown that in situations where the assumptions of the simple Euclidean model are met, point equilibria exist only if corresponding undominated directions also exist. But the converse of this theorem is false — some distributions of voter preferences yield direction but not point equilibria. In situations where both types of equilibria exist, contradictory predictions will not occur since equilibrium direction vectors point in the direction of existing equilibrium points. Finally, it was argued that a candidate has no incentive to adopt a type of strategy different from the type he knows his opponent will choose. This result can be interpreted as an internal stability property for each model. However, it was suggested that when a candidate's uncertainties about voters' preferences away from the status quo and about the extent of his opponent's information is considered, only the direction model may exhibit this internal stability.

Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription ItemWorking Paper
Additional Information:© 1979 Martinus Nijhoff b.v. The author wishes to thank John Ferejohn, Morris Fiorina, Melvin Hinich, and Charles Plott for their valuable criticism, comments, and time.
Issue or Number:2
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20171101-145119583
Persistent URL:
Official Citation:Matthews, S.A. Public Choice (1979) 34: 141.
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:82851
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:01 Nov 2017 23:07
Last Modified:15 Nov 2021 19:53

Repository Staff Only: item control page