Ghirardato, Paolo and Marinacci, Massimo (2000) Ambiguity Made Precise: A Comparative Foundation. Social Science Working Paper, 1026. California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA. (Unpublished) https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-162252775
![]() |
PDF (sswp 1026 - Dec. 2000)
- Submitted Version
See Usage Policy. 266kB |
Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-162252775
Abstract
The theory of subjective expected utility (SEU) has been recently extended to allow ambiguity to matter for choice. We propose a notion of absolute ambiguity aversion by building on a notion of comparative ambiguity aversion. We characterize it for a preference model which encompasses some of the most popular models in the literature. We next build on these ideas to provide a definition of unambiguous act and event, and show the characterization of the latter. As an illustration, we consider the classical Ellsberg 3-color urn problem and find that the notions developed in the paper provide intuitive answers.
Item Type: | Report or Paper (Working Paper) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Related URLs: |
| ||||||
Additional Information: | Revised. Originally dated to October 1997. An earlier version of this paper was circulated with the title “Ambiguity Made Precise: A Comparative Foundation and Some Implications”. We thank Kim Border, Eddie Dekel, Itzhak Gilboa, Tony Kwasnica, Antonio Rangel, David Schmeidler, audiences at Caltech, Johns Hopkins, Northwestern, NYU, Rochester, UC-Irvine, Universite Paris I, the TARK VII-Summer Micro Conference (Northwestern, July 1998), the 1999 RUD Workshop, and especially Simon Grant, Peter Klibanoff, Biung-Ghi Ju, Peter Wakker, and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and discussion. Our greatest debt of gratitude is however to Larry Epstein, who sparked our interest on this subject with his paper, and stimulated it with many discussions. Marinacci gratefully acknowledges the financial support of MURST. | ||||||
Group: | Social Science Working Papers | ||||||
Funders: |
| ||||||
Subject Keywords: | Ambiguity Aversion, Cardinal Risk Aversion, Choquet Expected Utility, Maxmin Expected Utility, Biseparable Preferences | ||||||
Series Name: | Social Science Working Paper | ||||||
Issue or Number: | 1026 | ||||||
Classification Code: | JEL: D81 | ||||||
Record Number: | CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-162252775 | ||||||
Persistent URL: | https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-162252775 | ||||||
Usage Policy: | No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided. | ||||||
ID Code: | 83010 | ||||||
Collection: | CaltechAUTHORS | ||||||
Deposited By: | Jacquelyn Bussone | ||||||
Deposited On: | 07 Nov 2017 17:56 | ||||||
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 19:01 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page