CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election

Alvarez, R. Michael and Nagler, Jonathan (1998) Economics, Entitlements, and Social Issues: Voter Choice in the 1996 Presidential Election. American Journal of Political Science, 42 (4). pp. 1349-1363. ISSN 0092-5853. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-163900072

[img] PDF - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

1312Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-163900072

Abstract

Theory: Contemporary theories of presidential election outcomes, especially the economic voting and spatial issue voting models, are used to examine voter choice in the 1996 presidential election. Hypotheses: First, we look at the effects of voter perceptions of the national economy on voter support for Clinton. Second, we look at the effects of candidate and voter positions on ideology and on a number of issues. Last, we examine whether voters' views on other issues-social issues such as abortion as well as issues revolving around entitlements and taxation that were emphasized by the campaigns-played significant roles in this election. Methods: We employ multinomial probit analysis of the 1996 National Election Studies data and simulations based on counterfactual scenarios which are based on different perceptions of macroeconomic conditions and issue platforms of candidates. Results: The effects of economic perceptions are much greater than the effects of voter issue positions on the election outcome. This behavior by voters leaves presidents substantial room to shirk on policy issues. But, some social issues, namely abortion, play a role in determining the election outcome. The presence of a third centrist candidate limited the ability of other candidates to improve their vote shares by moving in the issue space.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2991862JSTORArticle
http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170811-170524063Related ItemEarlier version published as Social Science Working Paper 1021
Additional Information:© 1998 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. This is one of many joint papers by the authors on multiparty elections; the ordering of their names reflects alphabetic convention. We thank Alan Abramowitz, Tara Butterfield, and Garrett Glasgow for their comments. A previous version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., August, 1997. This work was supported by National Science Foundation grants SBR-9709327 to Alvarez and SBR-9413939 and SBR-9709214 to Nagler. The datasets and computer code used to produce the results reported here can be obtained from the ICPSR article replication archive or from http://www.hss.caltech.edu/-rma/research.html. Formerly SSWP 1021.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
NSFSBR-9709327
NSFSBR-9413939
NSFSBR-9709214
Subject Keywords:Political candidates, Voting, Economics, Presidential elections, Financial economics, Applied economics, Economic impact analysis, Abortion, Social issues, Comparative economics
Issue or Number:4
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-163900072
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171106-163900072
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:83012
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jacquelyn Bussone
Deposited On:07 Nov 2017 17:50
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 19:01

Repository Staff Only: item control page