CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

"Less filling, tastes great": The realist-neoliberal debate

Niou, Emerson M. S. and Ordeshook, Peter C. (1994) "Less filling, tastes great": The realist-neoliberal debate. World Politics, 46 (2). pp. 209-234. ISSN 0043-8871. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171108-141642266

[img] PDF (sswp 815 - published) - Published Version
See Usage Policy.

2878Kb

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171108-141642266

Abstract

The debate between realists and neoliberals focuses on two issues: (1) delineating the goals that best account for the actions of states, especially patterns of cooperation and conflict; and (2) assessing whether institutions of different types can ameliorate conflict in an otherwise anarchic environment. Realists for their part concede that states may be concerned in the long run with absolute welfare; but they also believe that states, faced with inevitable threats to their survival, must concern themselves with relative position as measured by military capability, economic productivity, and the like thereby attenuating the likelihood of cooperation and the role of institutions as facilitators of cooperation. Neoliberals, by contrast, draw on the lessons of scenarios such as the repeated Prisoners' Dilemma and the myriad instances of actual cooperation in international politics and hence see less reason for supposing that states are concerned necessarily with relative gain. Consequently, they see greater opportunity for cooperation and an expanded role for institutions as facilitators of that cooperation.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2950673DOIArticle
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/world-politics/article/less-filling-tastes-great-the-realistneoliberal-debate/5A9657E03156D98E3AE58D6D86B473A6PublisherArticle
http://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170828-153031000Related ItemWorking Paper
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2950673JSTORArticle
Additional Information:© Trustees of Princeton University 1994. This research was supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Institute of Peace. We also wish to acknowledge the helpful comments and criticisms of Tom Schwartz, Peter Lange, and Joseph Grieco. Formerly SSWP 815.
Funders:
Funding AgencyGrant Number
US Institute of PeaceUNSPECIFIED
Subject Keywords:Coordinate systems, International politics, Game theory, Economic liberalism, Political debate, International cooperation, Political power, Military strategy, Hegemony, Prisoners
Issue or Number:2
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20171108-141642266
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20171108-141642266
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:83075
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Jacquelyn Bussone
Deposited On:08 Nov 2017 23:34
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 19:02

Repository Staff Only: item control page