CaltechAUTHORS
  A Caltech Library Service

A reply to Mayers and Rice (1979)

Roll, Richard (1979) A reply to Mayers and Rice (1979). Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (4). pp. 391-400. ISSN 0304-405X. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20190430-080846265

Full text is not posted in this repository. Consult Related URLs below.

Use this Persistent URL to link to this item: https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20190430-080846265

Abstract

Mayers and Rice do not resolve the basic problem in portfolio performance evaluation with the securities market line, the ambiguity introduced by being obliged to choose a market index. Other performance evaluation techniques exist and possess some superior qualities. The Mayers-Rice discussion of my critique of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) fails to recognize the CAPM's unusual testing implications and ignores the existence of alternative asset pricing theories. Residual analysis should give approximately correct estimates of the abnormal returns caused by specific events if it is conducted with the market model.


Item Type:Article
Related URLs:
URLURL TypeDescription
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90006-0DOIArticle
Additional Information:© 1979 Published by Elsevier B.V. The comments and suggestions of Bradford Cornell are gratefully acknowledged.
Issue or Number:4
Record Number:CaltechAUTHORS:20190430-080846265
Persistent URL:https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20190430-080846265
Official Citation:Richard Roll, A reply to Mayers and Rice (1979), Journal of Financial Economics, Volume 7, Issue 4, 1979, Pages 391-400, ISSN 0304-405X, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(79)90006-0. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X79900060)
Usage Policy:No commercial reproduction, distribution, display or performance rights in this work are provided.
ID Code:95104
Collection:CaltechAUTHORS
Deposited By: Tony Diaz
Deposited On:30 Apr 2019 19:24
Last Modified:03 Oct 2019 21:10

Repository Staff Only: item control page