Published June 1989 | Version Published
Working Paper Open

Legislative Districting

Abstract

America never knew the rotten boroughs that John Locke called "gross absurdities" and condemned as being incompatible with the right of equal representation (Locke, 1812, at 433). Rotten boroughs were towns "of which there remain[ed] not so much as the ruins, where scarce so much housing as a sheepcote, or more inhabitants than a shepherd [were] to be found, [but that sent] as many representatives to the grand assembly of law-makers, as a whole county numerous in people, and powerful in riches" (id., at 432). The United States did inherit from Britain the so-called Westminster system, in which legislators are elected, usually one apiece, from geographically defined districts, with the candidate receiving the most votes declared the winner. Perhaps the system was inevitable in a time with neither full-fledged political parties nor modem devices of transportation and communication. In any event, the system has been permanently embedded in American political thought and practice.

Attached Files

Published - sswp701.pdf

Files

sswp701.pdf

Files (478.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b9aca10611aaafee968e5df08ea49c29
478.1 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
81141
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170905-131623600

Dates

Created
2017-09-05
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Social Science Working Papers
Series Name
Social Science Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
701