of 6
The popular interest
in cornstarch and water mixtures
known as “oobleck” after the complex fluid in one of Dr.
Seuss’s classic children’s books arises from their transition
from fluid-like to solid-like behavior when stressed. The vis-
cous liquid that emerges from a roughly 2-to-1 (by volume)
combination of starch to water can be poured into one’s hand.
When squeezed, the liquid morphs into a doughy paste that
can be formed into shapes, only to “melt” into a puddle when
the applied stress is relieved. Internet videos show people
running across a large pool of the stuff, only to sink once they
stop in place, and “monsters” that grow out of the mixture
when it’s acoustically vibrated (for an example, see the online
version of this article).
Shear-thickening fluids certainly entertain and spark our
curiosity, but their effect can also vex industrial processes by
fouling pipes and spraying equipment, for instance. And yet,
when engineered into composite materials, STFs can be con-
trolled and harnessed for such exotic applications as shock-
absorptive skis and the soft body armor discussed in box 1.
Engineers and colloid scientists have wrestled with the
scientific and practical problems of shear-thickening col-
loidal dispersions—typically composed of condensed poly-
mers, metals, or oxides suspended in a liquid—for more than
a century. More recently, the physics community has ex-
plored the highly nonlinear materials in the context of jam-
ming
1
(see the article by Anita Mehta, Gary Barker, and Jean-
Marc Luck in P
HYSICS
T
ODAY
, May 2009, page 40) and the
more general study of colloids as model systems for under-
standing soft condensed matter.
Hard-sphere colloids are the “hydrogen atom” of col-
loidal dispersions. Because of their greater size and interaction
times compared with atomic and molecular systems, colloidal
dispersions are often well suited for optical microscopy and
scattering experiments using light, x rays, and neutrons. That
makes the dispersions, beyond their own intrinsic technolog-
ical importance, ideal models for exploring equilibrium and
near-equilibrium phenomena of interest in atomic and molec-
ular physics—for example, phase behavior and “dynamical ar-
rest,” in which particles stop moving collectively at the glass
transition. The relevance of colloids to atomic and molecular
systems breaks down, though, for highly nonequilibrium phe-
nomena. Indeed, shear thickening in strongly flowing colloidal
dispersions may be among the most spectacular, and elucidat-
ing, examples of the differences between the systems.
©
2009 American Institute of Physics, S-0031-9228-0910-010-8
October 2009 Physics Today
27
Shear thickening in
colloidal dispersions
Norman J. Wagner and John F. Brady
Shampoos, paints, cements, and soft body armor that stiffens under impact
are just a few of the materials whose rheology is due to the change in
viscosity that occurs when colloidal fluids experience shear stress.
Norm Wagner
is the Alvin B. and Julia O. Stiles Professor and chairperson of the department of chemical engineering at the University of
Delaware in Newark.
John Brady
is the Chevron Professor of Chemical Engineering at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena.
The unique material properties of increased energy dissipation
combined with increased elastic modulus make shear-
thickening fluids (STFs) ideal for damping and shock-absorption
applications. For example, so-called EFiRST fluids can be
switched between shear-thickened and flowing states using an
applied electric field, which controls the damping. Researchers
have also explored the STF response in sporting equipment
14
and automotive applications,
15
such as skis and tennis rackets
that efficiently dissipate vibrations without losing stiffness or
STFs embedded in a passenger compartment liner designed to
protect passengers in a car accident.
One commercial application of STF composites is expected
to be protective clothing.
16
The fabric imaged in these scanning
electron micrographs has STFs intercalated
into its woven yarns. Initial applications are
anticipated in flexible vests for correctional
officers. Longer-term research is being
performed in one of our laboratories (Wag-
ner’s), in conjunction with the US Army
Research Laboratory, to use STF fabrics for
ballistic, puncture, and blast protection for
the military, police, and first responders.
Tests of the materials demonstrate a marked enhancement in
performance. Consider this comparison between two STF-based
fabrics: The velocity at which a quarter-inch steel ball is likely to
penetrate a single layer of Kevlar is measured at about 100 m/s.
The velocity required to penetrate Kevlar formulated with poly-
meric colloids (polymethyl-methacrylate) is about 150 m/s, and
that for Kevlar formulated with silica colloids is 250 m/s,
2.5 times that for the Kevlar alone. High-speed video dem -
onstrations and further test details are available at http://
www.ccm.udel.edu/STF. Many other composites are now under
investigation for armor applications. (Images courtesy of Eric
Wetzel, US Army Research Laboratory.)
1mm
50μm
5μm
Box 1. Soft armor and other applications
Figure 1 illustrates the effect. The addition of colloidal
particles to a liquid such as water results in an increase in the
liquid’s viscosity and, with further addition, the onset of non-
Newtonian behavior—the dependence of its viscosity on an
applied shear stress or shear rate. At high particle concentra-
tions, the fluid behaves as if it has an apparent yield stress.
That is, it must be squeezed, like ketchup, before it can actu-
ally flow. At such concentrations, the colloidal dispersions fit
into the general paradigm for jamming in soft matter:
2
At
high particle densities and low stresses (and low tempera-
tures, usually), the system dynamically arrests, just as atomic,
molecular, polymeric, and granular systems do. But once the
yield stress is exceeded, the fluid’s viscosity drops, a response
known as shear thinning. That rheology is engineered into a
range of consumer products, from shampoos and paints to
liquid detergents, to make them gel-like at rest but still able
to flow easily under a weak stress. Again, the colloid model
fits the general paradigm for how matter behaves: It flows
when sheared strongly enough.
At higher stresses, shear thickening occurs: Viscosity
rises abruptly, sometimes discontinuously, once a critical
shear stress is reached. The rise is counterintuitive and incon-
sistent with our usual experience. Experiments and simula-
tions on atomic and small-molecule liquids predict only
shear thinning, at least until the eventual onset of turbulence
at flow rates that vastly exceed those of interest here.
The ubiquity of the phenomenon in the flow of sus-
pended solids is a serious limitation for materials processing,
especially when it involves high shear-rate operations. In a
1989 review, Howard Barnes writes,
Concentrated suspensions of nonaggregating
solid particles, if measured in the appropriate
shear rate range, will always show (reversible)
shear thickening. The actual nature of the shear
thickening will depend on the parameters of the
suspended phase: phase volume, particle size
(distribution), particle shape, as well as those of
the suspending phase (viscosity and the details of
the deformation, i.e., shear or extensional flow,
steady or transient, time and rate of deformation).
3
Inks, polymeric binders for paints, pastes, alumina casting
slurries, blood, and clays are all known to shear thicken. But
the earliest searches for the root cause came from industrial
laboratories that coated paper at high speeds (shear rates typ-
ically up to 10
6
Hz), a process in which the coating’s increasing
viscosity would either tear the paper or ruin the equipment.
Industrial labs remain intensely interested in the science. Hun-
dreds of millions of metric tons of cement are used globally
each year, for example, and production engineers are careful
to formulate modern high-strength cements and concretes that
don’t suffer from the effect—at least in a range of shear rates
important for processing and construction.
4
In pioneering work in the 1970s, Monsanto’s Richard
Hoffman developed novel light-scattering experiments to
probe the underlying microstructural transitions that accom-
panied shear thickening in concentrated latex dispersions.
5
The transition was observed to correlate with a loss of Bragg
peaks in the scattering measurement. On that basis, Hoffman
developed a micromechanical model of shear thickening as
a flow- induced order–disorder transition.
In the 1980s and early 1990s BASF’s Martin Laun and
others interested in products such as paper coatings and
emulsion-polymerized materials used then emerging small-
angle neutron-scattering techniques to demonstrate that an
order–disorder transition was neither necessary nor alone
sufficient to induce significant shear thickening.
6
Because
shear thickening is a highly nonequilibrium, dissipative state,
though, a full understanding had to await the development
of new theoretical and experimental tools.
Hydrodynamics
The dynamics of colloidal dispersions is inherently a many-
body, multiphase fluid-mechanics problem. But first consider
the case of a single particle. Fluid drag on the particle leads
to the Stokes- Einstein- Sutherland fluctuation–dissipation
relationship:
(1)
The diffusivity
D
0
scales with the thermal energy
kT
divided
by the suspending medium’s viscosity
μ
and the particle’s hy-
drodynamic radius
a
. That diffusivity sets the characteristic
time scale for the particles’ Brownian motion; it takes the par-
ticle
a
2
/
D
0
seconds to diffuse a distance equal to its radius. The
time scale defines high and low shear rates
γ
.
.
A dimensionless number known as the Péclet number,
Pe, relates the shear rate of a flow to the particle’s diffusion
rate; alternatively, the Péclet number can be defined in terms
of the applied shear stress
τ
:
(2)
The number is useful because dispersion rheology is often
measured by applied shear rates or shear stresses. Low Pe is
close enough to equilibrium that Brownian motion can
largely restore the equilibrium microstructure on the time
scale of slow shear flow. At sufficiently high shear rates or
stresses, though, deformation of the colloidal microstructure
by the flow occurs faster than Brownian motion can restore
it. Shear thinning is already evident around Pe ≈ 1. And
higher shear rates or stresses (higher Pe) trigger the onset of
shear thickening.
D
0
=.
kT
6
π
μ
a
D
0
kT
Pe =
.
=
γa
2
τa
3
.
28
October 2009 Physics Today
www.physicstoday.org
φ
= 0.47
φ
= 0.43
φ
= 0.34
φ
= 0.28
φ
= 0
φ
= 0.18
φ
= 0.09
φ
= 0.50
SHEAR STRESS (Pa)
VISCOSITY (Pa·s)
10
−3
10
−3
10
−2
10
−2
10
−1
10
−1
10
0
10
0
10
1
10
1
10
2
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
Figure 1. The viscosity of colloidal latex dispersions,
as a
function of applied shear stress. The volume fraction
φ
of
latex particles in each dispersion distinguishes the curves. A
critical yield stress must be applied to induce flow in a dis-
persion with high particle concentration. Beyond that criti-
cal stress, the fluid’s viscosity decreases (shear thinning). At
yet higher stress, its viscosity increases (shear thickening), at
least for latex dispersions above some concentration thresh-
old. (Adapted from ref. 12.)
The presence of two or more particles in the suspension
fundamentally alters the Brownian motion due to the inher-
ent coupling, or hydrodynamic interaction, between the mo-
tion of the particles and the displacement of the suspending
fluid. In a series of seminal articles in the 1970s, Cambridge
University’s George Batchelor laid a firm foundation for un-
derstanding the colloidal dynamics.
7
In essence, because any
particle motion must displace incompressible fluid, a long-
ranged—and inherently many-body—force is transmitted
from one particle through the intervening fluid to neighbor-
ing particles; the result is that all particles collectively disturb
the local flow field through hydrodynamic interactions. Such
interactions are absent in atomic and molecular fluids, where
the intervening medium is vacuum.
Batchelor’s calculation of the trajectories of non-
Brownian particles under shear flow identified the critical im-
portance of what’s known as lubrication hydrodynamics,
which describes the behavior of particles interacting via the
suspending medium at very close range. Those hydrodynam-
ics were already well known in the fluid mechanics of journal
bearings, which Osborne Reynolds investigated in the late
1800s and which remain of great importance to the workings
of modern machines. As box 2 explains, the force required to
push two particles together in a fluid diverges inversely with
their separation distance. Of particular significance is that at
close range, the trajectories that describe their relative motion
become correlated. That is, the particles effectively orbit each
other—indefinitely if they are undisturbed.
Batchelor’s work also led to a formal understanding
of how hydrodynamic coupling alters the fluctuation–
dissipation relationship, which, in turn, enabled him to cal-
culate the diffusion coefficient and viscosity of dilute disper-
sions of Brownian colloids at equilibrium.
7
Although it was
not fully appreciated at the time, the effect of hydrodynamic
interactions on particle trajectories is the basis for under-
standing the shear-thickening effect.
Beyond two particles
Hydrodynamic interactions in real colloidal suspensions re-
quire numerical methods to solve. The method of Stokesian
dynamics outlined in box 3 calculates the properties of ensem-
bles of colloidal and noncolloidal spheres under flow. A great
advantage of the simulations is their ability to resolve which
forces contribute to the viscosity. Moreover, they demonstrate
that the ubiquitous shear thinning in hard-sphere colloidal
dispersions is a direct consequence of particle rearrangement
due to the applied shear.
The equilibrium microstructure is set by the balance of
stochastic and interparticle forces at play—including electro-
static and van der Waals forces—but is not affected by hydro-
dynamic interactions. The low-shear (Pe ≪ 1) viscosity has
two components, one due to direct interparticle forces, which
dominate, and one due to hydrodynamic interactions.
7
Under weak but increasing shear flow (Pe ~ 1), the fluid
structure becomes anisotropic as particles rearrange to re-
duce their interactions so as to flow with less resistance. Fig-
ure 2 illustrates the evolution schematically. Near equilib-
rium, the resistance to flow is naturally high because shearing
the random distribution of particles causes them to fre-
quently collide, like cars would if careening haphazardly
along a road. With increasing shear rates, though, particles
behave as if merging into highway traffic: The flow becomes
streamlined and the increasingly efficient transport of col-
loidal particles reduces the system’s viscosity.
Simulations that ignore hydrodynamic coupling be-
tween particles show that the ordered, low-viscosity state
persists even as the Péclet number approaches infinity. Think
of particles sliding by in layers orthogonal to the shear-
www.physicstoday.org
October 2009 Physics Today
29
When two colloidal particles approach
each other, rising hydrodynamic pressure
between them squeezes fluid from the
gap. At close range, the hydrodynamic
force increases inversely with the distance
between the particles’ surfaces and
diverges to a singularity. The graph at right
plots the normalized force required to
drive two particles together (along a line
through their centers) at constant velocity.
The Navier–Stokes equations that govern
the flow behavior between particles are
time reversible, so the force is the same
one required to separate two particles.
In simple shear flow, particle trajecto-
ries are strongly coupled by the hydro -
dynamic interactions if the particles are
close together. The inset of the plot shows
a test particle’s trajectories, sketched as
paths as it moves in a shear flow relative to a reference particle
(gray sphere). The trajectories are reversible and can be divided
into two classes: those that come and go to infinity and those
that lead to correlated orbits—so-called closed trajectories—
around the reference particle.
Simulations and theory of concentrated dispersions that
account for those short-range hydrodynamics show that at
high shear rates, particles that are driven into close proximity
remain strongly correlated and are reminiscent of the closed
trajectories observed in dilute suspensions. The flow-induced
density fluctuations are known as hydroclusters. Because the
particle concentration is higher in the clusters, the fluid is under
greater stress, which leads to an increase in energy dissipation
and thus a higher viscosity. The illustration at right during a
stage of the Stokesian dynamics simulation shows colloidal par-
ticles in hydro clusters.
8
Box 2. Lubrication hydrodynamics and hydroclusters
NORMALI
ZED LUBRI
CATION FORCE
DISTANCE BETWEEN PARTICLE SURFACES
1000
100
10
1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
FLOW DIRECTION
SHEAR GRADI
ENT
−4
−3
−2
−1
0
1
2
3
4
−2
−1
0
1
2
Closed
SHEAR DI
RECTION