Published November 10, 1981 | Version Published
Working Paper Open

The professions of science in America: their ambivalent history

Abstract

Science started to become professionalized in the United States during the Jackson~an period. A principal aim of professionalization was to secure the goals and standards of research from interference by laymen by the institutionalization of scientific autonomy. Then and since, the scientific professions have sought to legitimate themselves by promising various quid pro quos to the society in exchange for the privilege of autonomy. The promises have included the claim that the study of science would foster morally disinterested habits of thinking and that the results of research would lead to practical., material benefit. Since the turn of the century, the claims of legitimation have in many respects been substantially validated, and the scientific professions have grown and prospered. But the very success of science, particularly after it became a favored ward of the federal government, combined with the arrangements of autonomy to provoke popular resentment and, in the era of Vietnam, rebellion. The turmoil revealed that the American scientific professions, at once respected and suspected, esoteric yet indispensable, were destined to live in tension with the larger society indefinitely.

Additional Information

Prepared for Delivery in the Notre Dame Lecture Series on The Professions in American History November 10, 1981

Attached Files

Published - HumsWP-0067.pdf

Files

HumsWP-0067.pdf

Files (960.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4b25690e6170f89e9fc11f40f8dc90e4
960.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
15154
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20090818-132859857

Dates

Created
2009-08-20
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Humanities Working Papers
Series Name
Humanities Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
67