of 5
Modeling and numerical simulation of the bubble cloud dynamics in an ultrasound field
for burst wave lithotripsy
Kazuki Maeda
, Tim Colonius
, Adam Maxwell
, Wayne Kreider
, and
Michael Bailey
Citation:
Proc. Mtgs. Acoust.
35
, 020006 (2018); doi: 10.1121/2.0000946
View online:
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000946
View Table of Contents:
https://asa.scitation.org/toc/pma/35/1
Published by the
Acoustical Society of America
ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN
Impact of stone type on cavitation in burst wave lithotripsy
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
35
, 020005 (2018);
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000950
Using a multi-rod waveguide system to create an ultrasound endoscope for imaging in aggressive liquids
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
35
, 055001 (2018);
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000944
Pulse coding with complementary Golay sequences for signal to noise ratio improvement in ultrasound
mammography
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
35
, 020002 (2018);
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000942
Update on clinical trials of kidney stone repositioning and preclinical results of stone breaking with one system
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
35
, 020004 (2018);
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000949
Direct aeroacoustic simulation of acoustic radiation in recorders with different windway geometries
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
35
, 035001 (2018);
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000933
A simple model of the Erhu soundbox
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics
35
, 035002 (2018);
https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000947
Volume
35
http://acousticalsociety.org/
176th Meeting of Acoustical Society of America
2018 Acoustics Week in Canada
Victoria, Canada
5-9 Nov 2018
Biomedical Acoustics: Paper 2pBAa5
Modeling
and
numerical
simulation
of
the
bubble
cloud
dynamics
in
an
ultrasound
field
for
burst
wave
lithotripsy
Kazuki
Maeda
Mechanical
Engineering,
University
of
Washington,
Seattle,
WA,
98115;
kazuki.e.maeda@gmail.com
Tim
Colonius
California
Institute
of
Technology,
Pasadena
,
CA
;
colonius@caltech.edu
Adam
Maxwell,
Wayne
Kreider
and
Michael
Bailey
University
of
Washington,
Seattle
,
WA
;
amax38@u.washington.edu,
wkreider@uw.edu,
mbailey@uw.edu
Modeling and numerical simulation of bubble clouds induced by intense ultrasound waves are
conducted to quantify the effect of cloud cavitation on burst wave lithotripsy, a proposed non-invasive
alternative to shock wave lithotripsy that uses pulses of ultrasound with an amplitude of O(1) MPa and a
frequency of O(100) kHz. A unidirectional acoustic source model and an Eulerian-Lagrangian method are
developed for simulation of ultrasound generation from a multi-element array transducer and cavitation
bubbles, respectively. Parametric simulations of the spherical bubble cloud dynamics reveal a new scaling
parameter that dictates both the structure of the bubble cloud and the amplitude of the far-field, bubble-
scattered acoustics. The simulation further shows that a thin layer of bubble clouds nucleated near a
kidney stone model can shield up to 90% of the incoming wave energy, indicating a potential loss of
efficacy during the treatment due to cavitation. Strong correlations are identified between the far-field,
bubble-scattered acoustics and the magnitude of the shielding, which could be used for ultrasound
monitoring of cavitation during treatments. The simulations are validated by companion experiments in
vitro.
Published by the Acoustical Society of America
© 2018 Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000946
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 35, 020006 (2018)
Page 1
1. INTRODUCTION
This paper provides a brief summary and overview of recent progress in modeling, numerical simulation,
and experiments on cavitation bubble clouds that are nucleated in the human body during treatment using
Burst Wave Lithotripsy (BWL) [1], a method of lithotripsy that uses pulses of high-intensity, focused ultra-
sound at a frequency of
O
(100)
kHz and an amplitude of
O
(1
10)
MPa to break kidney stones [7]. BWL is
an alternative to standard shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) [8], which uses much higher amplitude shock waves
delivered at a typically much lower rate. In both SWL and BWL, the tensile component of the pressure can
nucleate cavitation bubbles in the human body. For SWL, cavitation is a significant mechanism in stone
communition, but also causes tissue injury. By contrast, little is yet known about cavitation in BWL. A
series of our studies has successfully identified the effects of cavitation on BWL; although they may be less
injurious than cavitation in SWL, bubble clouds in BWL can scatter a large portion of the incoming wave
energy that would otherwise be transmitted into the stone and thereby potentially cause loss of efficacy of
stone comminution. The latest study reported in our article published in
The Journal of the Acoustical Socity
of America
[6] suggests that the activities of cavitation in the human body and the resulting energy shielding
could be identified by ultrasound monitoring in realtime during the treatment. We will review the results
and their implication for future work.
2. MODELING AND NUMERICAL FRAMEWORK
Our initial experiment identified that diffuse bubble clouds with a size of
O
(1)
mm are formed near the
focal region during the passage of the burst wave in a water tank [5]. They are highly distinct from denser
and larger bubble clouds observed in SWL. For simulation of the clouds in BWL, two numerical tools are
developed: a model of ultrasound generation from a medical transducer [2], and a method of simulating
clouds of cavitation bubbles in the focal region [3]. For the former, an analytical expression was derived
to express acoustic source distribution on an arbitrary curvature of two-dimensional surface that generates
a wave propagating in a favorable direction. For the latter, an Eulerian-Lagrangian method was introduced,
in which the liquid phase is descritized on structured grids and bubbles are treated as spherical cavities that
volumetrically oscillate at the sub-grid scale. The numerical framework enables large-scale simulation of
the ultrasound-induced cavitation growth and collapse of individual bubbles, their mutual interactions, and
the resulting bubble-scattered acoustic waves with and without a kidney stone.
3. ENERGY SHIELDING
A canonical study of the dynamics of isolated, spherical bubble clouds induced by intense ultrasound
waves suggests that even diffuse bubble clouds in BWL can scatter a large portion of the incoming wave
energy, and this can lead to loss of efficacy of stone comminution [4]. In order to quantify the energy
shielding in the presence of a kidney stone, a combined numerical and experimental study has recently
been conducted [6]. Figure 1 shows an overview of the study. In the experiment (Fig. 1a), 10 cycles of
a burst wave with a peak maximum amplitude of 7 MPa and a frequency of 335 kHz was focused from
a multi-element array medical transducer (Fig. 1b) on a cylindrical model kidney stone made of epoxy
resin. A high-speed camera was used to capture bubble clouds nucleated in the proximal surface of the
stone and bubble-scattered acoustic waves were measured by the transducer array that was used to generate
the burst wave. In high speed images, we observed a thin layer of bubble clouds nucleated on the proximal
surface of the stone (1c). The simulation successfully reproduced the experimental bubble clouds (Fig. 1d).
Figure (1e) shows the correlation between the scattering factor,
F
, and the shielding factor,
S
, obtained
from simulations with various values of the thickness and the initial void fraction of bubble clouds,
β
0
. The
scattering factor is a function of the maximum value of the imaging functional,
I
, a metric introduced to
K. Maeda et al.
Modeling and simulation of the bubble cloud dynamics for BWL
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 35, 020006 (2018)
Page 2
Figure 1: Overview of the study of the energy shielding of kidney stones by cavitation bubble clouds
in BWL. (a) shows the schematic of the experimental setup. (b) shows the multi-element array medical
transducer. (c) and (d) show images of representative bubble clouds observed during the passage of the
burst wave from the high-speed imaging and the the simulation, respectively. The height and diameter of
the stone are 10 and 6.25 mm. (e) shows the correlation between the scattering factor and the shielding
factor obtained from simulations with various values of the thickness and the initial void fraction of
bubble clouds,
β
0
. The figures are reproduced from [6].
quantify the amplitude of the back-scattered acoustic waves from the bubbles and the stone.
F
is defined as
F
=
max[
I
]
max[
I
ref
]
,
(1)
where
I
ref
is the reference value of imaging functional without bubbles. Therefore,
F
quantifies the en-
hancement/decay of the scattered acoustic waves due to the presence of bubbles. The shielding factor is
defined as
S
= 1
P
P
ref
,
(2)
where
P
is the total work done by the acoustic energy to the stone during each simulation.
P
ref
is the
reference value of
P
obtained in the case without bubbles. Note that
S
= 0
and
S
= 1
indicate no shielding
and perfect shielding (no energy transmission into the stone), respectively. Notably, the plot indicates a
strong positive correlation between the shielding factor and the scattering factor over the global range of
the data points, independent of the initial condition of bubbles. The shielding factor grows with increasing
the scattering factor and reaches
S
0
.
9
at
F
4
. The result indicates that up to 90% of the energy of
the incident burst wave can be absorbed/scattered by bubbles that would otherwise be transmitted into the
K.
Maeda
et al.
Modeling
and
simulation
of
the
bubble
cloud
dynamics
for
BWL
Proceedings
of
Meetings
on
Acoustics,
Vol.
35,
020006
(2018)
Page
3
stone, and this can lead to significant loss of efficacy of stone comminution. An important implication of
the correlation between the scattering factor and the shielding factor is that one may identify the magnitude
of the strong energy shielding by measuring the scattered acoustic waves without directly observing the
bubble clouds; cavitation and the shielding can be monitored during treatment using BWL. Extension of
the numerical and experimental setups to model an
in vivo
environment is desirable to further quantify the
energy shielding in practical conditions of BWL.
4. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
This series of combined numerical and experimental studies successfully identified the dynamics of
cavitation bubble clouds in BWL and quantified the energy shielding of kidney stones by the bubbles, the
latter of which may cause loss of efficacy of stone comminution. Recent work suggests that the magnitude
of the energy shielding can be identified by scattered ultrasound waves. The results motivate future work
to monitor and possibly control cavitation, and mitigate the energy shielding in real-time during clinical
treatment. Such a strategy may lead to further precise, efficient, and safe methods of stone commminution
for improved outcomes of BWL.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health under grants P01-DK043881 and K01-
DK104854.
REFERENCES
1
K. Maeda.
Simulation, Experiments, and Modeling of Cloud Cavitation with Application to Burst Wave
Lithotripsy
. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, 2018.
2
K. Maeda and T. Colonius. A source term approach for generation of one-way acoustic waves in the euler
and navier-stokes equations.
Wave Motion
, 75:36–49, 2017.
3
K. Maeda and T. Colonius. Eulerian–lagrangian method for simulation of cloud cavitation.
Journal of
Computational Physics
, 371:994 – 1017, 2018.
4
K. Maeda and T. Colonius. Bubble cloud dynamics in an ultrasound field.
to appear in Journal of Fluid
Mechanics
, 2019. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00129.
5
K. Maeda, W. Kreider, A. Maxwell, B. Cunitz, T. Colonius, and M. Bailey. Modeling and experimental
analysis of acoustic cavitation bubbles for burst wave lithotripsy.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
,
656(1):012027, 2015.
6
K. Maeda, A. D. Maxwell, T. Colonius, W. Kreider, , and M. Bailey. Energy shielding by cavitation bubble
clouds in burst wave lithotripsy.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
, 144(5), 2018.
7
A. Maxwell, B. Cunitz, W. Kreider, O. Sapozhnikov, R. Hsi, J. Harper, M. Bailey, and M. Sorensen.
Fragmentation of urinary calculi in vitro by burst wave lithotripsy.
The Journal of urology
, 193(1):338–
344, 2015.
8
Y. Pishchalnikov, O. Sapozhnikov, M. Bailey, J. Williams Jr, R. Cleveland, T. Colonius, L. Crum, A. Evan,
and J. McAteer. Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shock-
waves.
Journal of Endourology
, 17(7):435–446, 2003.
K. Maeda et al.
Modeling and simulation of the bubble cloud dynamics for BWL
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, Vol. 35, 020006 (2018)
Page 4