Published December 15, 2002 | Version Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Early patterning of the mouse embryo -- contributions of sperm and egg

  • 1. ROR icon Polish Academy of Sciences
  • 2. ROR icon University of Cambridge

Abstract

The first cleavage of the fertilised mouse egg divides the zygote into two cells that have a tendency to follow distinguishable fates. One divides first and contributes its progeny predominantly to the embryonic part of the blastocyst, while the other, later dividing cell, contributes mainly to the abembryonic part. We have previously observed that both the plane of this first cleavage and the subsequent order of blastomere division tend to correlate with the position of the fertilisation cone that forms after sperm entry. But does sperm entry contribute to assigning the distinguishable fates to the first two blastomeres or is their fate an intrinsic property of the egg itself? To answer this question we examined the distribution of the progeny of early blastomeres in embryos never penetrated by sperm — parthenogenetic embryos. In contrast to fertilised eggs, we found there is no tendency for the first two parthenogenetic blastomeres to follow different fates. This outcome is independent of whether parthenogenetic eggs are haploid or diploid. Also unlike fertilised eggs, the first 2-cell blastomere to divide in parthenogenetic embryo does not necessarily contribute more cells to the blastocyst. However, even when descendants of the first dividing blastomere do predominate, they show no strong predisposition to occupy the embryonic part. Thus blastomere fate does not appear to be decided by differential cell division alone. Finally, when the cortical cytoplasm at the site of sperm entry is removed, the first cleavage plane no longer tends to divide the embryo into embryonic and abembryonic parts. Together these results indicate that in normal development fertilisation contributes to setting up embryonic patterning, alongside the role of the egg.

Additional Information

© 2002 The Company of Biologists. Accepted 12 September 2002. We thank David Glover, Stephen Frankenberg, Jonathon Pines, Roger Pedersen and Chris Graham for their comments on the draft of this manuscript. M. Z. G. is grateful to the Wellcome Trust for their support. K. P. thanks Marie Currie for the Fellowship.

Attached Files

Published - 5803.full.pdf

Supplemental Material - DEV00170.pdf

Files

5803.full.pdf

Files (509.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:042acc5b5b186b11eb2b01f68976bdfc
354.2 kB Preview Download
md5:816f33ed45030e84f28a52ee0f668839
155.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
94837
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20190422-100408698

Funding

Wellcome Trust
Marie Curie Fellowship

Dates

Created
2019-04-23
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-16
Created from EPrint's last_modified field