Chari
et al
.,
Sci. Adv.
7
, eabh1683 (2021) 26 November 2021
SCIENCE ADVANCES
|
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1 of 17
GENETICS
Whole-animal multiplexed single-cell RNA-seq reveals
transcriptional shifts across
Clytia
medusa cell types
Tara Chari
1
†, Brandon
Weissbourd
1,2,3
†, Jase
Gehring
4
†, Anna
Ferraioli
5
†, Lucas
Leclère
5
,
Makenna Herl
6
, Fan
Gao
7
, Sandra
Chevalier
5
, Richard R.
Copley
5
*, Evelyn
Houliston
5
*,
David J.
Anderson
1,2,3
*, Lior
Pachter
1,8
*
We present an organism-wide, transcriptomic cell atlas of the hydrozoan medusa
Clytia hemisphaerica
and describe
how its component cell types respond to perturbation. Using multiplexed single-cell RNA sequencing, in which
individual animals were indexed and pooled from control and perturbation conditions into a single sequencing
run, we avoid artifacts from batch effects and are able to discern shifts in cell state in response to organismal per-
turbations. This work serves as a foundation for future studies of development, function, and regeneration in
a genetically tractable jellyfish species. Moreover, we introduce a powerful workflow for high-resolution,
whole-animal, multiplexed single-cell genomics that is readily adaptable to other traditional or nontraditional
model organisms.
INTRODUCTION
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is enabling the survey of
complete transcriptomes of thousands to millions of cells (
1
), re-
sulting in the establishment of cell atlases across whole organisms
(
2
–
6
), exploration of the diversity of cell types throughout the ani-
mal kingdom (
3
,
7
–
9
), and investigation of transcriptomic changes
under perturbation (
10
,
11
). However, scRNA-seq studies involving
multiple samples can be costly and may be confounded by batch
effects resulting from multiple distinct library preparations (
12
,
13
).
Recent developments in scRNA-seq multiplexing technology expand
the number of samples, individuals, or perturbations that can be
incorporated within runs, facilitating well-controlled scRNA-seq
experiments (
11
,
14
–
18
). These advances have created an opportunity
to explore systems biology of whole organisms at single-cell resolu-
tion, merging the concepts of cell atlas surveys with multiplexed
single-cell experimentation.
Here, we apply this powerful experimental paradigm to a planktonic
model organism. We examine the medusa (free-swimming jellyfish)
stage of the hydrozoan
Clytia hemisphaerica
, with dual motivations.
First,
Clytia
is a powerful, emerging model system spanning multiple
fields, from evolutionary and developmental biology to regenera-
tion and neuroscience (
19
–
24
). While previous work has characterized
a number of cell types in the
Clytia
medusa (
21
), a whole-organism
atlas of transcriptomic cell types has been lacking. Such an atlas is a
critical resource for the
Clytia
community and an important addi-
tion to the study of cell types across animal phylogeny.
Second, emerging multiplexing techniques present new oppor-
tunities for system-level studies of cell types and their changing
states at unprecedented resolution in whole organisms. The
Clytia
medusa offers an appealing platform for pioneering these studies. It
is small, transparent, and has simple tissues and organs, stem cell
populations actively replenishing many cell types in mature animals,
and remarkable regenerative capacity (
19
,
22
,
24
–
27
). Furthermore,
the 1-cm-diameter adult medusae used in this study contain on the
order of 10
5
cells, making it possible to sample cells comprehensively
across a whole animal in a cost-effective manner using current
scRNA-seq technology (fig. S1 and tables S1 and S2). In this study,
we generate a cell atlas for the
Clytia
medusa while simultaneously
performing a whole-organism perturbation study, providing the
first medusa single-cell dataset and an examination of changing cell
states across the organism. Our work also provides a proof-of-principle
for perturbation studies in nontraditional model organisms, using
multiplexing technology and a reproducible workflow with lessened
reliance on functional annotation, from the experimental imple-
mentation to the data processing and analysis.
RESULTS
We compared control versus starved animals, as this strong, natural
-
istic stimulus was likely to cause notable, interpretable changes in
transcription across multiple cell types. Laboratory-raised, young
adult, female medusae were split into two groups of five animals,
one deprived of food for 4 days, and the second fed daily (see Mate-
rials and Methods). We observed numerous phenotypic changes in
starved animals, including a marked size reduction reflecting two-
to threefold fewer cells (Fig. 1, fig. S2, and see Materials and Methods)
(
28
), and a notable reduction in gonad size. Correspondingly, the
number of eggs released per day decreased (fig. S3) (
29
).
For scRNA-seq, single-cell suspensions were prepared from each
whole medusa and individually labeled with unique ClickTag bar-
codes (
14
) using a seawater (SW) compatible workflow (see Materials
and Methods, tables S2 and S3, Supplementary Methods, and fig. S4).
All labeled suspensions were pooled and processed with the 10X
Genomics V2.0 workflow and Illumina sequencing, allowing con-
struction of a combined dataset across organisms and treatments,
1
Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
2
Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen Institute for Neuroscience,
Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
3
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
4
Department of Genome Sciences, University
of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
5
Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Laboratoire
de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche-sur-mer (LBDV), 06230, France.
6
University of New Hampshire School of Law, Concord, NH 03301, USA.
7
Caltech
Bioinformatics Resource Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA
91125, USA.
8
Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA.
*Corresponding author. Email: copley@obs-vlfr.fr (R.R.C.); houliston@obs-vlfr.fr (E.H.);
wuwei@caltech.edu (D.J.A.); lpachter@caltech.edu (L.P.)
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Copyright © 2021
The Authors, some
rights reserved;
exclusive licensee
American Association
for the Advancement
of Science. No claim to
original U.S. Government
Works. Distributed
under a Creative
Commons Attribution
NonCommercial
License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
Downloaded from https://www.science.org at California Institute of Technology on December 07, 2021
Chari
et al
.,
Sci. Adv.
7
, eabh1683 (2021) 26 November 2021
SCIENCE ADVANCES
|
RESEARCH ARTICLE
2 of 17
without requiring batch correction (Fig. 1, fig. S4, A to D, and table
S1). A total of 13,673 single-cell profiles derived from 10 individuals
(5 control and 5 starved) passed quality control, with high concor-
dance in cell type abundance and gene expression among animals in
the same treatment condition (see Materials and Methods and fig.
S5). From this gene expression matrix, we (i) derived a
Clytia
me-
dusa cell atlas and (ii) generated a high-resolution resource of the
transcriptional impact of starvation across all observed cell types.
To validate the cell atlas and assess technical variability across
and within multiplexed experiments, we performed an additional,
independent round of sequencing from 12 individuals. We found
that cell types were highly concordant between experiments and
confirmed a reduction of batch effect–induced variability within
multiplexed experiments (see below). During this second sequencing
run, we took advantage of our multiplexing approach to perform an
experiment designed both to search for transcripts with “immediate
early gene (IEG)”–like behavior in
Clytia
and to test its sensitivity
for detecting more rapid or subtle gene changes than those of the
extreme starvation perturbation. For this, we exposed
Clytia
medusae
to multiple transient, ionic stimuli and dissociated ~1 hour later. This
paradigm allowed us to identify candidate genes with IEG-like proper
-
ties across many cell types, including neurons (figs. S6 to S8 and
table S4) (
30
). IEGs are valuable tools in neuroscience, to identify
neurons that are active following a specific stimulus or behavior (
30
).
This methodology is thus able to detect transcriptional responses
across diverse stimulus-response paradigms (table S5).
A
Clytia
cell atlas
To generate the cell atlas, we clustered the cells using the gene
expression matrix, extracting 36 cell types and their corresponding
marker genes (see Materials and Methods; Fig. 2, A and B; figs. S9 to
S11; and table S5). Each of the cell types was present in each of the
individual animals sequenced (fig. S12). We then generated a low-
dimensional representation (
31
,
32
) of these cell types (Fig. 2A). We
could group the cell types into seven broad classes (Fig. 2A) that
correspond to the outer epidermis, the inner gastrodermis, and to
likely derivatives of the multipotent interstitial stem cell population
(i-cells). I-cells are a specific feature of hydrozoans, and are particu-
larly well characterized in
Hydra
, where they generate neural cells,
gland cells, and stinging cells (nematocytes), as well as germ cells
(
8
,
20
,
33
). Our dataset was derived from female medusae so it lacks
male germ cells, and late stage oocytes are expected to be too large
for capture by the dissociation procedure.
The 36 cell types (see Materials and Methods and Fig. 2, B to D)
were concordant between the two separate multiplexed experiments
(see “Starvation” and “Stimulation” sections in Materials and Methods)
and robust to different transcriptome annotations (figs. S6 and S13).
For some of them, cell type identity could be assigned on the basis of
published information on gene expression in
Clytia
and/or of homol-
ogous genes in other animals, while for the others we performed in situ
hybridization for selected marker genes (Fig. 2C, figs. S11 and S14,
and table S3). Previously known cell types apparent in our data in-
cluded i-cells (
34
) and nematocytes at successive stages of differen-
tiation (
35
–
37
), as well as oocytes (
38
), gonad epidermis, manubrium
epidermis, and bioluminescent cells in the tentacles that each express
specific endogenous green fluorescent proteins (GFPs) (
39
).
In situ hybridization for a selection of diagnostic muscle cell type
genes allowed us to describe cell types making up the smooth and
striated muscles, for instance, distinguishing the striated muscle cells
lining the bell (subumbrella) and velum (Fig. 2, C and D, and fig.
S14) (
23
,
27
). Within known cell types, clustering revealed an unap-
preciated degree of cell heterogeneity, yielding novel subtypes. For
example, eight cell types could be distinguished within the gastro-
dermis, six of which were designated gastro-digestive (GD A-F) on
the basis of a largely shared set of marker genes (Fig. 2B), including
enzymes associated with intracellular digestion, such as CathepsinL
(
40
). Unlike most other clusters, the GD clusters differ primarily in
their relative levels of gene expression, rather than by unique marker
genes. They thus likely represent variations on a similar digestive-
absorptive epithelial cell type with different functional specializations, dis
-
tributed across the main digestive compartments of the gastrodermis—
the manubrium, gonad, and tentacle bulb—and the gastrovascular
canals that link them (figs. S11 and S14). Comparison of gene modules
Tags
cDNA
Perturbation
Dissociation
and
ClickTag
multiplexing
Pooling
and
library
generation
Sequencing
Multi-
organism
data
analysis
Control
Starved (4 days)
1
2
3
4
5
Animal
Cells
Animals
Genes
Fig. 1. Overview of whole-organism multiplexed experimentation.
Experimen-
tal design of the starvation experiment showing (1) images of control versus 4-day
starved animals (scale bars, 0.5 cm), (2) dissociation of individual medusa and
chemical tagging of cells with ClickTags to enable multiplexed scRNA-seq, (3) pooling
of cells and library generation from lysed cells to generate (4) sequencing libraries
for the multiplexed cDNA and ClickTag data and create (5) single-cell resolved
gene expression count matrices from all animals (see Materials and Methods).
Downloaded from https://www.science.org at California Institute of Technology on December 07, 2021
Chari
et al
.,
Sci. Adv.
7
, eabh1683 (2021) 26 November 2021
SCIENCE ADVANCES
|
RESEARCH ARTICLE
3 of 17
Gastroderm
Epidermal/muscle
Gland cell
Stem cell/
germ cell
Nematocyte
Neural
Bioluminescent
cells
Top marker genes
AB
C
Broad cell type categories
D
( )
( )
0. 0
1. 0
Z
-scored expression
Radial
canal
Circular
canal
Velu
m
Subumbrella
Exumbrella
Tentacle
Manubrium
Gonad
Mesoglea
Tentacle
bulb
8
18
30
33
4
3 GastroDigestiv
e-A
7 GastroDigestiv
e-B
14 GastroDigestiv
e-
C
15 GastroDigestiv
e-D
19 GastroDigestiv
e-E
24 GastroDigestiv
e-F
16
Te
ntacle bulb distal gastroder
m
33 Endodermal plate
28
Te
ntacle GFP cell
s
1 Exumbrella epidermis
4 Manubrium epidermi
s
8 Striated muscle of subumbrella
18 Ra
dial smooth muscle
20
Te
ntacle epidermis
29 Gonad epidermis
30 Striated muscle of velu
m
6 Neural cell early stages
9 Neural cells A (incl. GL
Wa
, MIH cells)
26 Neural cells B (incl. RF
amide cells)
31 Neural cells C (incl.
YF
amide cells
)
BC
EM
22 Gland cells-A
27 Gland cells-B
25 Gland cells
-C
32 Gland cells-D
34 Gland cells-E
0 i-
cells
35
Ve
ry early oo
cy
tes
13 Small ooct
ye
s
2 Medium oo
cy
tes
12 Nemato
cy
te precursors
11 Early nematoblasts
23 M
id nematoblasts
17 Late nematoblasts
21 Mature nematoc
ytes
GC
SC
NY
NE
Ce
ll types
within
each class
GD
Whole medusa
Manubrium
Gonad
Tentacle bulb
FibColl-B
33
16
TPM-B
8
30
TPM-A
18
20
1
18
tb
8
30
33
0
GC
21
18
GD
4
CathepsinL
18
GD
Chitinase
34
ShKT-
Tr
ypA
27
ST MyHCb
4
FibCdom-
1
25
CathepsinL
18
GD
ST MyHCb
29
ST MyHCa
20
FibColl-B
16
29
18
GD
13
2
Znf845
0
RF
amide
26
21
BP10-lik
e
14
Tentacle
0
18
GD
16
20
18
NY
18
NE
26
21
m
g
Mout
h
ST MyHC
a
20
8
30
4
Nanos1
13
2
35
35
Mos3
11
12
Cathepsin
L
18
GD
Nematocilin
Fig. 2. The
Clytia
Medusa Cell Atlas.
(
A
) Two-dimensional UMAP embedding of cells labeled by seven cell type classes. Class colors are retained in (
B
) to (
D
). (B) Heatmap
of top marker genes from the sequencing data with 36 Louvain clusters comprising the seven cell type classes. (C) In situ hybridization patterns for a selection of cluster
marker genes providing spatial location on the animal (comprehensive set in fig. S14). The label GD denotes general markers for GastroDigestive cell types. Scale bars, 100
m.
(D) Schematics of
Clytia
medusa, manubrium, gonad, and tentacle bulb showing the main cell types. Abbreviations of cell class names: GD, GastroDigestive; BC, bioluminescent
cells; EM, epidermal/muscle; GC, gland cells; SC, stem cell/germ cell; NY, nematocytes; NE, neural cells.
Downloaded from https://www.science.org at California Institute of Technology on December 07, 2021
Chari
et al
.,
Sci. Adv.
7
, eabh1683 (2021) 26 November 2021
SCIENCE ADVANCES
|
RESEARCH ARTICLE
4 of 17
discriminating these gastrodermal clusters (fig. S15) indicates that
GD-B may have a particular role in transforming growth factor–
signaling, likely involving the ligands BMP2/4 and BMP5/8. GD-D
is enriched for a module associated with cell-cell junctions, while
GD-F shows relative depletion, suggesting poorer integration into
the gastrodermal epithelium (fig. S15) and possible involvement in
GD cell mobilization during starvation and regeneration (
19
). GD-C
cells, localized closest to the endodermal plate, are enriched for
transcripts associated with extracellular matrix and mesoglea (jelly)
production (Fig. 2, C and D, and figs. S11 and S14). Expression of
these and other genes implicated in mesoglea production, such as
fibrillar collagens, is also a characteristic of endodermal plate cells
(cluster 33) and proximal tentacle-bulb endoderm cells (cluster 16).
Digestive gland cells fell into five types expressing different mix-
tures of enzymes for extracellular digestion. These showed overlapping
distributions in the mouth and stomach regions of the manubrium.
Two subtypes of gland cells (type C and E) were also present within
the gonad gastroderm. Four broad clusters corresponding to neural
cells each appeared to represent mixed populations and could be
subdivided by further analyses to define 14 likely subpopulations of
neurons (see below). Seven major clusters could be assigned identi-
ties as nematocytes at different developmental stages, comprising
two groups with highly distinct transcriptional signatures. Four of
these we designate “nematoblasts” on the basis of high levels of
transcripts related to formation of the nematocyst (stinging capsule)
(
35
,
36
,
41
). The other three, designated as differentiating and mature
“nematocytes,” show no enrichment of these nematocyst transcripts
but strongly express highly conserved proteins of the actin-rich
“stereovilli” of vertebrate hair cells, including Whirlin, Harmonin,
and Sans/USH-IG.
This is consistent with observations of similar
actin-based protrusions surrounding a central cilium in many of the
mechanosensory cell types described in other cnidarian species (
42
).
Related but more elaborate actin structures are associated with the
cnidocil of mature nematocytes, but it had not previously been known
to share functional hair-cell components (
42
,
43
). Nematocilin, a
hydrozoan-specific component of the nematocil (ciliary trigger for
nematocyte discharge) (
44
), is also expressed in these clusters (fig.
S14, table S5, and see below). In situ hybridizations revealed marker
expression in morphologically distinguishable nematocytes, notably
including two lines along the oral face of each tentacle (Fig. 3E and
fig. S14), a notable arrangement overlooked in previous studies.
A remarkable feature of the
Clytia
medusa is that it constantly
generates many cell types, notably neural cells and nematocytes from
prominent i-cell pools in the tentacle bulb epidermis (
36
) and at
other sites (
34
). Within our dataset, we thus expected to be able to
capture dynamic information relating to the development of i-cell–
derived cell types, similar to that extracted from Hydra polyp single-
cell transcriptome data (
8
). As in
Hydra
, our cell atlas revealed clear
connections between the neuronal and nematocyte populations and
the i-cell population (Fig. 2A and figs. S11 and S14) (
3
,
8
), likely
corresponding to differentiation trajectories (
35
,
36
). In contrast, we
found no clear developmental connection between i-cells and gland
cells and little to no expression of markers of the common neuronal-
gland cell precursors identified in
Hydra
(
8
) (fig. S16). In
Hydra
,
gland cells are generated not only from the i-cell lineage but also by
processes of self-renewal and position-dependent transdifferentia-
tion (
8
). In the
Clytia
medusa, digestive gland cells show widespread
distribution across distinct regions of the manubrium and gonad
compartments of the gastrovascular system, spatially separated from
i-cell populations positioned proximally in both these organs (fig.
S14). It is possible that these alternative pathways may dominate
over direct differentiation from the i-cell lineage in this system.
To address the developmental relationships between the different
neural and nematocyte clusters and identify developmental markers,
we assigned pseudo-time values to the cells and ranked genes in each
trajectory (see Materials and Methods and Fig. 3A). This revealed
trajectories consistent with these cell types both deriving from
i-cells (Fig. 3, A and B) (
8
). Examination of the nematocyte trajectory
revealed the early expression of genes previously not associated
with this process, including
Znf845
and
Mos3
(Fig. 3, C and D) (
45
).
Nematocyst-related genes—such as minicollagens, polyglutamate
synthases,
Dkk3
, and
NOWA
—were then expressed during a first
major phase of nematogenesis, consistent with previous reports
(Fig. 3, C and D; corresponding expression domains in Fig. 3E and
fig. S14) (
35
–
37
,
41
). The trajectory analysis confirmed continuity
between the “nematoblast” clusters and the distinct and under-
appreciated nematocyte differentiation phase, characterized by ex-
pression of putative nematocil structural proteins and nematocilin
expression at the end of the trajectory (Fig. 3, C and D, and figs. S11
and S14) (see above). The two phases of nematogenesis were linked
by the expression of rare specific marker genes for cluster 17 (e.g.,
M14 peptidase in Fig. 3E and fig. S14). Consistent with this linking
of the nematoblast and differentiation phases revealed in trajectory
analysis, in situ markers showed distinct expression territories in
the tentacle bulb and tentacle, respectively (Fig. 3E). Furthermore,
we found that markers of both phases and their respective orthologs,
including the “hair cell” gene set, were appropriately distributed
among transcriptomes derived from dissected
Clytia
bulb and ten-
tacle regions (
35
) and between developing and mature nematocyte
scRNA-seq clusters in
Hydra
(
8
).
Cnidarian nervous systems represent both valuable points of
phylogenetic comparison and tractable platforms for systems neuro
-
science (
3
,
8
,
20
). However, the molecular heterogeneity of neural
cell types and their developmental progression remains largely
unexplored, particularly in the more complex medusa forms. We
therefore extracted genes expressed during neural development
that included those encoding
bHLH
,
Sox
, and other transcription
factors with potential roles in neurogenesis or fate specification and
numerous other genes of interest in neuronal development, such as
cell adhesion molecules (Fig. 4, A to C, and table S5) (
36
,
46
–
48
). In
mature neurons, neuropeptides are thought to be the dominant
neurotransmitters in cnidarians (
49
,
50
) but are challenging to
identify because of rapid sequence evolution (
51
,
52
). In conjunc-
tion with sequence-based analysis, we were able to identify 10 new
likely neuropeptides on the basis of their inclusion as marker genes
for the four basic neural clusters (6, 9, 26, and 31 in Fig. 2, B and D),
increasing the number of predicted
Clytia
neuropeptides to 21
(table S3). Our pseudo-time ranking revealed that many of these
predicted neuropeptides mark the later stages of neural cluster
trajectories, likely defining distinct, mature neural subpopulations
(Fig. 4D).
We extracted and reclustered the neural supergroup (“Neural;”
Fig. 2, A and B) to characterize neural subtypes. This distinguished
14 subpopulations of neurons and a progenitor population, ex-
pressing cell cycle and conserved neurodevelopmental genes including
the
bHLH
transcription factor Neurogenin (subcluster 0; Fig. 4D).
Notably, the neuronal subpopulations show combinatorial neuro-
peptide precursor expression, often with a distinct and identifying
Downloaded from https://www.science.org at California Institute of Technology on December 07, 2021