Optimal Uncertainty Quantification
Abstract
We propose a rigorous framework for Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in which the UQ objectives and the assumptions/information set are brought to the forefront. This framework, which we call Optimal Uncertainty Quantification (OUQ), is based on the observation that, given a set of assumptions and information about the problem, there exist optimal bounds on uncertainties: these are obtained as extreme values of well-defined optimization problems corresponding to extremizing probabilities of failure, or of deviations, subject to the constraints imposed by the scenarios compatible with the assumptions and information. In particular, this framework does not implicitly impose inappropriate assumptions, nor does it repudiate relevant information. Although OUQ optimization problems are extremely large, we show that under general conditions, they have finite-dimensional reductions. As an application, we develop Optimal Concentration Inequalities (OCI) of Hoeffding and McDiarmid type. Surprisingly, contrary to the classical sensitivity analysis paradigm, these results show that uncertainties in input parameters do not necessarily propagate to output uncertainties. In addition, a general algorithmic framework is developed for OUQ and is tested on the Caltech surrogate model for hypervelocity impact, suggesting the feasibility of the framework for important complex systems.
Additional Information
The authors gratefully acknowledge portions of this work supported by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under Award Number DE-FC52- 08NA28613 through Caltech's ASC/PSAAP Center for the Predictive Modeling and Simulation of High Energy Density Dynamic Response of Materials. Calculations for this paper were performed using the mystic optimization framework [33]. We thank the Caltech PSAAP Experimental Science Group — Marc Adams, Leslie Lamberson, Jonathan Mihaly, Laurence Bodelot, Justin Brown, Addis Kidane, Anna Pandolfi, Guruswami Ravichandran and Ares Rosakis — for Formula (5.1). We thank Sydney Garstang for proofreading the manuscript.Attached Files
Submitted - Caltech_ACM_TR_2010_03.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:921b653eaf88c4588cd200965cc043db
|
2.2 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 27192
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20111012-113158874
- Department of Energy (DOE) National Nuclear Security Administration
- DE-FC52-08NA28613
- Created
-
2011-10-19Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2020-02-24Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Applied & Computational Mathematics
- Series Name
- ACM Technical Reports
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 2010-03