Similar scaling laws for earthquakes and Cascadia slow-slip events
Abstract
Faults can slip not only episodically during earthquakes but also during transient aseismic slip events, often called slow-slip events. Previous studies based on observations compiled from various tectonic settings have suggested that the moment of slow-slip events is proportional to their duration, instead of following the duration-cubed scaling found for earthquakes. This finding has spurred efforts to unravel the cause of the difference in scaling. Thanks to a new catalogue of slow-slip events on the Cascadia megathrust based on the inversion of surface deformation measurements between 2007 and 2017, we find that a cubic moment–duration scaling law is more likely. Like regular earthquakes, slow-slip events also have a moment that is proportional to A^(3/2), where A is the rupture area, and obey the Gutenberg–Richter relationship between frequency and magnitude. Finally, these slow-slip events show pulse-like ruptures similar to seismic ruptures. The scaling properties of slow-slip events are thus strikingly similar to those of regular earthquakes, suggesting that they are governed by similar dynamic properties.
Additional Information
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2019. Received: 31 August 2018. Accepted: 1 August 2019. Published online: 23 October 2019. This study was funded by NSF award EAR-1821853. S.M. is currently supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from CNES. We thank J. Gomberg for discussion and for providing a revised version of the catalogue of tremor durations presented in ref. 10. We thank R. Burgmann for comments that helped to improve the study. Author Contributions: S.M., A.G. and J.-P.A. designed the study, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript; S.M. and A.G. performed the computations. J.-P.A. defined the scope of the study. Data availability: The durations and moments estimated in this study are listed in Extended Data Table 1 and in the Source Data of Fig. 3. The slip model of Michel et al., which is used as input in this study is available at: ftp://ftp.gps.caltech.edu/pub/avouac/Cascadia_SSE_Nature/Data_for_Nature/ The authors declare no competing interests. Peer review information: Nature thanks Roland Burgmann, Ken Creager and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Attached Files
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_Fig5_ESM.jpg
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_Fig6_ESM.jpg
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_Fig7_ESM.jpg
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_Fig8_ESM.jpg
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_MOESM3_ESM.xlsx
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx
Supplemental Material - 41586_2019_1673_Tab1_ESM.jpg
Files
41586_2019_1673_Fig5_ESM.jpg
Files
(21.6 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:72089e3dd888b96b4c254621da416d82
|
238.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:79bba7b871379fe604b34f22a3633719
|
303.6 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:d8a459f7eda7c9f9222cd43df4600134
|
264.2 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:92fa5b82bdf4ea1e8b8d3fd9b3fcab95
|
269.9 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:2be476d4293abf79c45d2df8be2411ad
|
12.4 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:eb5fcb5c43ccf6e0b6361f1ae712ce24
|
200.9 kB | Download |
|
md5:632cbbdd9502735063bd921c6ed6ba5d
|
7.8 MB | Download |
|
md5:2a01f3f4084848a5f02dfcab5c2e6eb3
|
42.0 kB | Download |
|
md5:2617596843b2e794da34097c9d3644ad
|
22.7 kB | Download |
|
md5:1a34aa48db230982a23b9a25b3e186f2
|
85.6 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- Eprint ID
- 97594
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20190801-132601461
Related works
Funding
- NSF
- EAR-1821853
- Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES)
Dates
- Created
-
2019-10-23Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-16Created from EPrint's last_modified field