Extremely wideband signal shaping using one- and two-dimensional
nonuniform nonlinear transmission lines
E. Afshari
a
Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 136-93 Pasadena, California 91125
H. S. Bhat
b
Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027
A. Hajimiri
c
Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 136-93 Pasadena, California 91125
J. E. Marsden
d
Control and Dynamical Systems, California Institute of Technology, 107-81 Pasadena, California 91125
Received 16 May 2005; accepted 20 January 2006; published online 1 March 2006;
corrected 3 March 2006
We propose a class of electrical circuits for extremely wideband
EWB
signal shaping. A
one-dimensional, nonlinear, nonuniform transmission line is proposed for narrow pulse generation.
A two-dimensional transmission lattice is proposed for EWB signal combining. Model equations for
the circuits are derived. Theoretical and numerical solutions of the model equations are presented,
showing that the circuits can be used for the desired application. The procedure by which the circuits
are designed exemplifies a modern, mathematical design methodology for EWB circuits. ©
2006
American Institute of Physics
.
DOI:
10.1063/1.2174126
I. INTRODUCTION
As the name implies, signal shaping means changing
certain features of incoming signals, such as the frequency
content, pulse width, and amplitude. By extremely wideband
EWB
, we mean frequencies from dc to more than 100
GHz. EWB signal shaping is a hard problem for several rea-
sons. If we attempt to solve the problem with transistors, we
are limited by the highest possible transistor cutoff frequency
f
T
, the maximum efficiency of the transistor, and also its
breakdown voltage. For example, these bottlenecks arise in
high-frequency fully-integrated power amplifier design.
1,2
These same considerations hold for the wider class of
active devices. Even if we restrict consideration to silicon-
based technologies, active devices are technology dependent,
making it difficult to port the design from one complemen-
tary metal-oxide semiconductor
CMOS
technology to an-
other. Therefore, active device solutions to the signal shaping
problem will be limited in both functionality and portability.
Existing high-frequency circuits typically use either
tuned circuits
e.g.,
LC
tank
or microwave techniques
e.g.,
transmission lines as impedance transformers
. These ap-
proaches are inherently narrowband and cannot be used in
applications such as ultrawideband impulse radio and ultra-
wideband radar
e.g., ground penetrating radar
, pulse sharp-
ening, jitter reduction, or a wideband power amplifier.
We propose a solution to the EWB signal shaping prob-
lem, using passive components only, that overcomes these
limitations. This solution is an extension of ideas presented
in our previous work.
3
The circuits we propose consist of
artificial transmission lines as well as extensions to two-
dimensional lattices. An artificial transmission line consists
of a number of
LC
blocks connected as in Fig. 1. By choos-
ing the elements properly, we can ensure that signals incident
on the left boundary of the line are shaped in a particular way
as they propagate to the right. In what follows, we will ex-
plain that by tapering the values of the inductance
L
and
capacitance
C
in the line, along with introducing voltage
dependence in the capacitors
C
, we can make circuits that
perform a variety of tasks. Extending the line to a two-
dimensional lattice, we can use similar ideas to design cir-
cuits that combine the power in an array of incoming signals.
In this paper, we consider millimeter-scale on-chip trans-
mission lines on a semiconductor substrate, e.g., silicon. The
relative resistance of each element on the chip is small
enough to be neglected, so we do not consider the effect of
loss. The effect of energy loss in transmission lines has been
discussed in our earlier work.
3
Philosophically, we are motivated by developments in
the theory of nonlinear waves, especially solitons. Solitons
are localized pulses that arise in many physical contexts
through a balance of nonlinearity and dispersion. Since the
1970s, various investigators have discovered the existence of
solitons in nonlinear transmission lines
NLTLs
, through
a
Electronic mail: ehsan@caltech.edu
b
Electronic mail: hsb2106@columbia.edu
c
Electronic mail: hajimiri@caltech.edu
d
Electronic mail: marsden@cds.caltech.edu
FIG. 1. 1D artificial transmission line.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
99
, 054901
2006
0021-8979/2006/99
5
/054901/16/$23.00
© 2006 American Institute of Physics
99
, 054901-1
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
both mathematical models and physical experiments. Re-
cently, NLTLs have proven to be of great practical use in
EWB focusing and shaping of signals.
3,4
A. Survey
Here we offer a brief, selective survey of the transmis-
sion line literature relevant to our application. Before pro-
ceeding, let us make a few definitions that will help label the
transmission lines under consideration.
Definitions
Linear
Capacitors and inductors are constant with
respect to changes in voltage.
Nonlinear
Capacitors are voltage dependent and/or
inductors are current dependent.
Uniform
Identical capacitors and inductors are used
throughout the line.
Nonuniform
Different capacitors and inductors are used
in different parts of the line.
In the present work, we do not consider current-dependent
inductors because of implementation issues.
Scott’s classical treatise
5
was among the first to treat the
physics of transmission lines. Scott showed that the
Korteweg–de Vries
KdV
equation describes weakly nonlin-
ear waves in the uniform NLTL described above. If the non-
linearity is moved from the capacitor parallel to the shunt
branch of the line to a capacitor parallel to the series branch,
the nonlinear Schrödinger
NLS
equation is obtained
instead.
6
At the other end of the spectrum, nonuniform linear
transmission lines have been extensively used by the micro-
wave community for impedance matching and filtering. In
fact, the idea of a nonuniform linear transmission line goes
back to the work of Heaviside in the 19th century
see Kauf-
man’s bibliography
7
for details
.
Model equations for lines that combine nonuniformity,
nonlinearity, and resistive loss have been derived in the
literature,
8
but these models were not analyzed and the pos-
sible applications of a nonuniform NLTL were not explored.
In other work, numerics and experiments
9
indicated that a
nonuniform NLTL could be used for “temporal contraction”
of pulses.
Extensions to two dimensions have been briefly consid-
ered. For the description of long waves in a two-dimensional
2D
lattice consisting of one-dimensional
1D
lines coupled
together by capacitors, one obtains a modified Zakharov-
Kuznetsov
ZK
equation.
10
It should be mentioned that in
Sec. 2.9 of Scott’s treatise,
5
precisely this sort of lattice is
considered, and a coupled mode theory is introduced. These
lattices consist of weakly coupled 1D transmission lines, in
which wave propagation in one direction is strongly and in-
herently favored.
When a small transverse perturbation is added to the
KdV equation, one obtains a Kadomtsev-Petviashvili
KP
model equation. Dinkel
et al.
11
carry out this procedure for a
uniform nonlinear 2D lattice, and mention that the circuit
may be useful for “mixing” purposes; however, no physical
applications are described beyond this brief mention in the
paper’s concluding remarks.
B. Present work
We review one-dimensional transmission line theory
with the aim of clarifying the effects of discreteness, nonuni-
formity, and nonlinearity. Continuum equations that accu-
rately model these effects are derived. We show analytically
that a linear nonuniform transmission line, with constant de-
lay but exponentially tapered impedance, can be used for
combination of signals. The speed and amplitude of outgoing
signals are analyzed directly from the continuum model. We
show numerically that introducing weak nonlinearity causes
outgoing pulses to assume a solitonlike shape. Practical ap-
plications of this are described.
We generalize the notion of a transmission line to a two-
dimensional transmission lattice. For a linear nonuniform lat-
tice, we write the continuum model and derive a family of
exact solutions. A continuum model is also derived for the
nonlinear nonuniform lattice. In this case, we apply the re-
ductive perturbative method and show that a modified KP
equation describes the weakly nonlinear wave propagation in
the lattice.
For the two-dimensional lattices, we present a variety of
numerical results. We choose the inductance and capacitance
of lattice elements in a particular way, which we call an
electric lens or funnel configuration. We solve the semidis-
crete model of the lattice numerically, and show that the
resulting solutions have physically useful properties. For ex-
ample, our numerical study predicts that a linear nonuniform
lattice can focus up to 70% of the power of input signals
with frequency content in the range of 0–100 GHz. We
present numerical studies of nonlinear lattices as well. In this
case, power focusing is present alongside frequency upcon-
version, or the ability of the lattice to
increase
the frequency
content of input signals. The numerical studies show that
nonlinear nonuniform lattices can be used for EWB signal
shaping applications.
II. UNIFORM NONLINEAR 1D
In this section we review a few facts about uniform
NLTLs and their use for
pulse narrowing
see Fig. 1
.At
node
n
in the transmission line, Kirchoff’s laws yield the
coupled system of ordinary differential equations
ODEs
V
n
−
V
n
+1
=
d
n
+1/2
dt
,
1a
I
n
−1/2
−
I
n
+1/2
=
dQ
n
dt
.
1b
Here
n
+1/2
=
I
n
+1/2
is the magnetic flux through the inductor
that is between nodes
n
and
n
+1, and
dQ
n
=
c
V
n
dV
n
is the
charge on the varactor at node
n
. Using this,
1
can be
rewritten and combined into
054901-2 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
d
dt
c
V
n
dV
n
dt
=
V
n
+1
−2
V
n
+
V
n
−1
.
2
Starting from this semidiscrete model, we develop a con-
tinuum model in the standard way.
Write
x
n
as the position of node
n
along the line; assume
that the nodes are equispaced and that
h
=
x
n
+1
−
x
n
is small.
Then, define
V
x
,
t
such that
V
x
n
,
t
=
V
n
t
. This means that
V
n
+1
=
V
x
n
+1
=
V
x
n
+
h
. We Taylor expand to fourth order in
h
and find that
2
is equivalent to
t
c
V
V
t
=
h
2
2
V
x
2
+
h
4
12
4
V
x
4
.
3
Let
L
=
/
h
and
C
V
=
c
V
/
h
be, respectively, the induc-
tance and capacitance per unit length. Then
3
becomes
L
t
C
V
V
t
=
2
V
x
2
+
h
2
12
4
V
x
4
.
4
We regard this as a continuum model of the transmission line
that retains the effect of discreteness in the fourth-order term.
A. Discreteness generates dispersion
Considering small sinusoidal perturbations about a con-
stant voltage
V
0
, we compute the dispersion relation
12
for
4
,
k
=
k
1−
h
2
12
k
2
,
5
where
=1/
LC
V
0
. We see that for
h
0,
k
depends
nonlinearly on
k
. Wave trains at different frequencies move
at different speeds.
In the applied mathematics/physics literature, one finds
authors introducing dispersion into transmission lines
through the use of shunt-arm capacitors. This is unnecessary.
Experiments on transmission lines we have described, with-
out shunt-arm capacitors, reveal that dispersive spreading of
wave trains due to the discrete nature of the line is a com-
monly observed phenomenon. Accurate continuum models
of the transmission line we have considered should include
this discreteness-induced dispersion. Therefore, we use infor-
mation about the
h
=0 case only if it leads to mathematical
insights about the
h
0 case, which is what truly concerns
us.
B. Traveling wave solutions
Retaining
h
as a small but nonzero parameter, we search
for traveling wave solutions of
4
of the form
V
x
,
t
=
f
u
,
where
u
=
x
−
t
. Using this ansatz and the varactor model
C
V
=
C
0
1−
bV
, we obtain the ODE,
2
−
0
2
f
=
h
2
0
2
12
f
4
+
b
2
2
f
2
,
6
where
0
−2
=
LC
0
and primes denote differentiation with re-
spect to
u
. Now integrating twice with respect to
u
,weob-
tain
2
−
0
2
f
=
h
2
0
2
12
f
+
b
2
2
f
2
+
A
̃
u
+
B
̃
.
7
We search for a localized solution, for which
f
,
f
,
f
→
0as
u
→
±
. This forces the constants to be zero:
A
̃
=
B
̃
=0. Now
multiplying
7
by 2
f
, integrating with respect to
u
, and
again setting the constant to zero,
f
2
=
Af
2
−
Bf
3
,
8
where
A
=
12
2
−
0
2
h
2
0
2
and
B
=
4
b
2
h
2
0
2
.
The first-order ODE
8
can be integrated exactly. Taking the
integration constant to be zero, we obtain the single-pulse
solution,
V
x
,
t
=
3
2
−
0
2
b
2
sech
2
3
2
−
0
2
0
h
x
−
t
.
9
The sech
2
form of this pulse is the same as for the soliton
solution of the KdV equation. Indeed, applying the reductive
perturbation method to
4
, we obtain KdV in the unidirec-
tional, small-amplitude limit.
C. Reduction to KdV
Starting with
4
and again modeling the varactors by
C
V
=
C
0
1−
bV
, introduce a small parameter
1 and
change variables via
s
=
1/2
x
−
0
t
,
T
=
3/2
t
,
10
with
0
−2
=
LC
0
. Writing
V
x
,
t
=
V
−1/2
s
+
0
−3/2
T
,
−3/2
T
,
we find that
x
=
1/2
s
and
t
=
3/2
T
−
1/2
0
s
.
11
Using the formula for
C
V
, we rewrite the left-hand side of
4
,
LC
0
t
1−
bV
V
t
=
0
−2
2
t
2
V
−
b
2
V
2
.
Using this and
11
, we rewrite
4
in terms of the long space
and time variables
s
and
T
,
0
−2
3
2
T
2
−2
2
0
2
T
s
+
0
2
2
s
2
V
−
b
2
V
2
=
2
V
s
2
+
h
2
12
2
4
V
s
4
.
12
Now introducing the formal expansion
V
=
V
1
+
2
V
2
+
̄
,
13
the order
2
terms in
12
cancel. Keeping terms to lowest
order,
3
,wefind
054901-3 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
0
2
V
1
s
T
+
b
0
2
4
2
V
1
2
s
2
+
0
2
h
2
24
4
V
1
s
4
=0,
14
In what follows, we abuse notation by using
V
to denote
V
1
.
Integrating
14
with respect to
s
yields the KdV equation,
V
T
+
b
0
2
V
V
s
+
0
h
2
24
3
V
s
3
=0.
15
The KdV equation has been investigated throughly and many
of its properties are well known, including solution by in-
verse scattering, complete integrability, and geometric struc-
ture. Hence we will not pursue these topics here.
D. Remark 1: Zero-dispersion case
If we had a purely continuous transmission line, we
would take the
h
→
0 limit of
4
and obtain
L
t
C
V
V
t
=
2
V
x
2
.
16
This equation, which in general yields discontinuous shock
solutions, has been studied before
13
and we will not repeat
the general analysis. However, note that if we carry out the
reductive perturbation method on
16
, we end up with the
h
→
0 limit of
15
, which is the inviscid Burgers equation,
V
T
+
bc
0
2
V
V
s
=0.
17
It is well known
14
that for any choice of initial data
V
x
,0
,
no matter how smooth, the solution
V
x
,
t
of
17
develops
discontinuities
shock waves
in finite time. Meanwhile, for
large classes of initial data, the KdV equation
15
possesses
solutions that stay smooth globally in space and time.
15
What is intriguing is this: suppose we keep
h
as an arbi-
trary, nonzero parameter and solve
15
analytically, using
the inverse scattering method, we obtain a function
u
h
x
,
t
.
In the work of Lax and Levermore,
16
it was shown that in the
zero-dispersion
h
→
0 limit, the sequence
u
h
x
,
t
does
not
converge to a solution of Burgers’ equation
17
. Therefore,
we conclude that the
h
0 continuum model allows funda-
mentally different phenomena than the
h
=0 model. In the
nonlinear regime, we must keep track of discreteness.
E. Remark 2: Linear case
Note that if
C
V
=
C
is constant, we arrive at the linear,
dispersive wave equation,
2
V
t
2
−
1
LC
2
V
x
2
=
h
2
12
4
V
x
4
.
18
This equation can be solved exactly using Fourier trans-
forms. In fact, we will carry out this procedure for a similar
equation in the following section.
F. Frequency response
So far we have discussed special solutions of
4
and the
KdV equation. Our primary concern is the transmission lines
for the mixing of EWB signals. The physical setup requires
that an incoming signal enter the transmission line at, say, its
left boundary. The signal is transformed in a particular way
and exits the line at, say, its right boundary.
Various authors have examined the initial-value problem
for the KdV equation. It is found that, as
t
→
, the solution
of the KdV equation consists of a system of interacting soli-
tons. Therefore, we expect that the incoming sinusoidal sig-
nals will be reshaped into a series of solitonlike pulses. Sup-
pose we wish to determine the precise frequency response in
the nonlinear regime, given an input sinusoid of frequency
,
we expect to see solitons of frequency
F
at the output end
of the line. We will address the problem of quantitatively
determining
F
in future work.
For now, we mention that a comprehensive mathematical
analysis of the
quarter-plane
problem,
u
t
+
uu
x
+
u
xxx
=0,
19a
u
x
,0
+
=0,
19b
u
0,
t
=
g
t
,
19c
for the KdV equation is not possible at this time. This in-
cludes the frequency response problem for which
g
t
=
A
sin
t
. Inverse scattering methods applied to
19
yield
information only in the simplest of cases, i.e., when
g
t
is a
constant.
17
The problem is that in order to close the evolution
equations for the scattering data associated with
19
, one
needs to postulate some functional form for
u
x
0,
t
and
u
xx
0,
t
. It does not appear possible to say
a priori
what
these functions should be.
One approach
18
is to postulate that these functions van-
ish identically for all
t
. They obtain approximate closed-form
solutions in the case where
g
t
is a single square-wave
pulse, with
g
t
0 for
t
T
. In future work, we will inves-
tigate whether this is possible if
g
t
is a sinusoidal pulse.
In this paper, we attempt an analytical solution of the
frequency response problem only in the
linear
regime. For
the
nonlinear
regime, we discuss special solutions and the
solution of the initial-value problem for the underlying
model equations to gain a qualitative understanding of the
models. For quantitative information about the general non-
linear, nonuniform frequency response problem, we use di-
rect numerical simulations of the semidiscrete model equa-
tions.
III. NONUNIFORM 1D
In this section, models for nonuniform transmission lines
will be derived and their dynamics will be discussed. We
study the one-dimensional case because they can be solved
exactly; these solutions will be used in our analysis of the
two-dimensional case. By nonuniform, we mean that the in-
ductance
L
x
and capacitance
C
x
varys as a function of
position,
L
x
0,
C
x
0.
054901-4 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
A. Linear case
For now, assume that the line is linear,
C
V
=0.
Then, modifying
1
, we obtain the exact, semidiscrete
model,
V
n
−
V
n
+1
=
n
+1/2
dI
n
+1/2
dt
,
20a
I
n
−1/2
−
I
n
+1/2
=
c
n
dV
n
dt
,
20b
which can be combined into the single second-order equa-
tion,
n
+1/2
V
n
−1
−
V
n
−
n
−1/2
V
n
−
V
n
+1
=
c
n
n
−1/2
n
+1/2
d
2
V
n
dt
2
.
21
Let
L
x
and
C
x
be, respectively, the inductance and ca-
pacitance per unit length at the position
x
along the transmis-
sion line. This yields the relations
L
x
=
n
/
h
and
C
x
=
c
n
/
h
, and allows us to expand,
n
+1/2
=
hL
x
+
h
/2
=
h
L
+
h
2
dL
dx
+
h
2
8
d
2
L
dx
2
+
h
3
48
d
3
L
dx
3
+
O
h
4
,
n
−1/2
=
hL
x
−
h
/2
=
h
L
−
h
2
dL
dx
+
h
2
8
d
2
L
dx
2
−
h
3
48
d
3
L
dx
3
+
O
h
4
.
Expanding
V
as before, we retain terms up to fifth order in
h
on both sides,
h
3
LV
xx
−
V
x
L
x
+
h
5
1
12
LV
xxxx
+
1
8
L
xx
V
xx
−
1
6
L
x
V
xxx
−
1
24
L
xxx
V
x
=
h
3
C
L
2
−
h
2
4
L
x
2
V
tt
,
22
where we have used subscripts to denote differentiation. We
now assume that
L
varies slowly as a function of space, so
that
L
hL
x
. Hence our continuum model is
V
xx
−
LCV
tt
=
V
x
L
x
L
−
h
2
1
12
V
xxxx
−
1
6
L
x
L
V
xxx
.
23
To be clear, we specify that
L
:
0,
→
R
and
C
:
0,
→
R
are smooth and positive. The parameter
h
is a measure of
discreteness, which as discussed above contributes disper-
sion to the line.
1. Physical scenario
We are interested in solving the following
signaling
problem
: the transmission line is dead
no voltage, no cur-
rent
at
t
=0, at which point a sinusoidal voltage source is
switched on at the left boundary. We assume that the trans-
mission line is long, and that it is terminated at its
physical
right boundary in such a way that the reflection coefficient
there is very small. This assumption means that we may
model the transmission line as being semi-infinite.
We formalize this as an initial-boundary-value problem
IBVP
. Given a transmission line on the half-open interval
0,
, we seek a function
V
x
,
t
:
0,
0,
→
R
that
solves
LCV
tt
=
V
xx
+
h
2
12
V
xxxx
−
L
x
L
V
x
+
h
2
6
V
xxx
,
24a
V
x
,0
=0,
24b
V
t
x
,0
=0,
24c
V
0,
t
=
A
sin
t
,
24d
V
x
0,
t
=0,
24e
where
A
and
are arbitrary constants, while
must be posi-
tive.
2. Nondimensionalization
Examining the form of problem
24
, we expect that
when
L
x
=0
the uniform case
, it may be possible to find
exact traveling wave solutions. Hence we exploit the linear-
ity of
24a
and seek solutions when
L
is a slowly varying
function of
x
.
In order to carry this out, we must first nondimensional-
ize the continuum model
23
. Suppose that the transmission
line consists of
N
sections, each of length
h
. This gives a
total length
d
=
Nh
. Next, suppose that we are interested in
the dynamics of
24
on the time scale
T
. Using the constants
d
and
T
, we introduce the rescaled, dimensionless length, and
time variables,
x
=
x
d
and
t
=
t
T
.
25
We then nondimensionalize
23
by writing it in terms of the
variables
25
,
LCd
2
T
2
V
t
t
=
V
x
x
+
1
12
N
2
V
x
x
x
x
−
L
x
L
V
x
+
1
6
N
2
V
x
x
x
.
26
For the purposes of notational convenience, we omit primes
from now on.
3. Exponential tapering
The general nonuniform problem, with arbitrary
L
and
C
, may not be classically solvable in closed form. Here we
consider the exponentially tapering given by
L
x
=
Be
x
,
27a
054901-5 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
C
x
=
1
B
0
2
e
−
x
,
27b
where
0
,
, and
B
are positive constants. In our discussion
of 2D transmission lattices, we will see that a generalization
of this tapering solves certain EWB signal-shaping problems.
Using
27
, the nondimensionalized 1D equation
26
simpli-
fies considerably to
0
−2
d
2
T
2
V
tt
=
V
xx
+
1
12
N
2
V
xxxx
−
V
x
+
1
6
N
2
V
xxx
.
28
We will analyze this equation subject to the previously dis-
cussed initial/boundary conditions
24b
–
24e
.
4. Perturbative solution
We will find solutions of
28
accurate to first order in
.
Let us begin by solving the
=0 case. Note that the case
=0 arose in our discussion of the uniform problem
see
18
.
From the setup of the problem, it is clear that the solu-
tion will consist of a wave train moving to the right at some
finite speed. Hence we try the ansatz,
V
x
,
t
=
f
kx
−
t
,
x
k
t
0,
x
k
t
.
29
Substituting this into
28
gives
0
−2
d
2
T
2
2
f
z
=
k
2
f
z
+
1
12
N
2
k
4
f
4
z
,
where
z
=
kx
−
t
. Integrating twice with respect to
z
and set-
ting integration constants to zero gives a second-order ODE,
which has the general solution,
f
kx
−
t
=
A
̄
sin
N
12
k
2
−
0
−2
d
2
T
−2
2
k
2
kx
−
t
+
.
Now imposing the boundary condition
24d
, we solve for
the amplitude and phase:
A
̄
,
=
−
A
,0
. We also obtain the
dispersion relation
2
=
k
2
0
2
T
2
2
d
2
1±
1−
1
3
0
−2
h
2
T
2
2
.
Because this is a dispersion relation for a non-
dimensionalized equation,
and
k
are unitless,
19
as is the
parameter
. For a physical solution, the phase velocity must
be positive
/
k
0
, so we raise the above equation to the
1/2 power and discard the negative root. Putting everything
together, we have the two fundamental modes,
V
±
x
,
t
=
sin
k
±
x
−
t
,
x
±
k
t
0,
x
±
k
t
.
30a
±
k
=
0
T
2
d
1±
1−
1
3
0
−2
h
2
T
2
2
1/2
.
30b
By linearity of
28
, the general solution of the
=0 equation
is the superposition,
V
=−
A
1
V
+
−
A
2
V
−
,
31
where
A
1
+
A
2
=
A
. Applying the second boundary condition
24e
we have
A
1
=
A
+
+
−
−
,
A
2
=−
A
−
+
−
−
.
32
5. Discussion
Using the dispersion relation
30b
, we can calculate the
cutoff frequency of the line. This is the frequency
for
which
becomes imaginary, which in the case of
30b
gives the relation
2
3
T
2
lc
.
Here we used the definition
0
−1
=
LC
, where
L
=
l
/
h
and
C
=
c
/
h
.
Taking
h
=0 in the above formula produces the classical
solution to the linear wave equation, with the single right-
moving mode,
0
/
k
=
0
.
Taking
h
0in
30
, we find three effects of discreteness.
The first is dispersion: though the phase velocity equals the
group velocity of the outgoing signal, viz.,
±
k
=
d
±
dk
,
we see from
30b
that both of these velocities are nonlinear
functions of
, the frequency of the incoming signal. Second,
there are now two right-moving modes, one fast and one
slow, corresponding to
+
/
k
and
−
/
k
. Finally, discreteness
causes a decrease in the maximum speed of the wave train;
this follows immediately from
+
/
k
0
/
k
.
6. General case
We examine
28
with
0. On physical grounds we
expect that the voltage grows as a function of distance from
its starting point
x
=0. Accordingly, we introduce the ansatz,
V
x
,
t
= exp
c
1
x
f
z
,
33
where
z
=
kx
−
t
. Inserting
33
in
28
, we obtain
0
−2
2
f
=
c
1
2
f
+2
c
1
kf
+
k
2
f
+
h
2
12
c
1
4
f
+4
c
1
3
kf
+6
c
1
2
k
2
f
+4
c
1
k
3
f
3
+
k
4
f
4
−
c
1
f
+
kf
+
h
2
6
c
1
3
f
+3
c
1
2
kf
+3
c
1
k
2
f
+
k
3
f
3
.
34
054901-6 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
Choose
c
1
=
/2 to eliminate the
f
3
terms exactly. Two of
the
f
terms cancel. We further ignore all terms of order
m
,
m
2, obtaining
0
−2
2
f
=
k
2
f
+
h
2
12
k
4
f
4
,
which is precisely the equation we solved in the
=0 case.
Hence an approximate solution of
28
, correct to
O
2
,is
given by
V
x
,
t
= exp
x
/2
V
x
,
t
,
35
with
V
defined in
30
–
32
.
7. Discussion
The qualitative effect of a small but positive value of
is now clear. The frequency and speed of propagation for the
outgoing signal is unchanged from the
=0 case. The only
effect we expect to observe is growth of the initial sinusoid
as it propagates down the line.
Since it appears from
35
that we have produced a volt-
age that is unbounded in space, we remind the reader that in
reality, the transmission line is terminated at its right bound-
ary, say at
x
=
X
. So long as the resistive termination is cho-
sen so that the reflection coefficient is nearly zero, we may
use
35
to predict the wave form at any point
x
0,
X
.
8. Remark
Exact solutions of
34
can be obtained computationally.
Let us outline the procedure in this case. First, we write the
full expression of
34
in the form
i
=0
4
q
i
+1
f
i
z
=0,
where
q
=
−
2
/4
−
4
h
2
/64
3
h
2
/12
k
k
2
−
0
−2
2
−
2
h
2
/8
k
2
0
h
2
k
4
/12
.
36
Here we use the convention that
q
=
q
1
,
q
2
,
q
3
,
q
4
,
q
5
. One
way to determine a unique solution is to specify the four
initial conditions
f
i
0
, where
i
=0, 1, 2, 3. We leave it as an
exercise to show that the four conditions
24b
–
24e
also
determine the solution uniquely. Then
36
can be solved via
the matrix exponential. Let
y
R
4
have coordinates
y
i
=
f
i
−1
for
i
=1, 2, 3, 4. Now write
36
as the first-order
system,
d
y
dz
=
M
y
,
37
where
M
=
0100
0010
0001
−
q
1
/
q
5
−
q
2
/
q
5
−
q
3
/
q
5
0
.
38
The solution to
37
is then
y
z
=
e
Mz
y
0
.
39
In practice, given particular values of all required constants,
the solution can be found easily using
MATLAB
. As a final
remark, note that we do not need to compute the entire vec-
tor
y
, but merely the first component
y
1
z
=
f
z
.
B. Nonlinear case
Of course, we can build transmission lines that are both
nonuniform and nonlinear. To model such lines, we recog-
nize that
C
n
V
in
20b
is no longer time independent.
Hence combining
20a
and
20b
in the nonlinear case,
where
C
/
V
0, we find
n
+1/2
V
n
−1
−
V
n
−
n
−1/2
V
n
−
V
n
+1
=
n
−1/2
n
+1/2
d
dt
c
n
dV
n
dt
.
40
From here, the derivation of the continuum model proceeds
precisely as in the linear case. The end result is
V
xx
−
L
t
CV
t
=
V
x
L
x
L
−
h
2
1
12
V
xxxx
−
1
6
L
x
L
V
xxx
.
41
Suppose we take
C
x
,
V
=
C
0
x
1−
bV
and
L
x
C
0
x
=
0
−2
.
Then introducing the change of variables
10
, we may again
use
11
to rewrite our equation. We note that in order to
balance terms, we must treat the inductance in a particular
way. We first write
L
x
=
L
−1/2
s
+
0
−3/2
T
,
so that
L
T
=
−3/2
dL
dx
.
In this case, the order
3
equation is
0
2
V
1
s
T
+
b
0
2
4
2
V
1
2
s
2
+
0
2
h
2
24
4
V
1
s
4
−
0
2
L
T
L
V
1
s
=0.
42
By introducing the time variable
=
0
T
and taking
L
T
/
L
=
/
0
, we remove
0
from the equation. We integrate with
respect to
s
, obtaining
V
+
b
2
VV
s
+
h
2
24
V
sss
−
V
=0,
43
where as before we use
V
to denote
V
1
, the leading-order
contribution in the expansion
72
. Equation
43
has been
studied before as a “variable-depth” KdV equation. The now
classical result
20
is that for
small but positive, the usual
soliton wave form of the KdV equation is modified by a shelf
of elevation that trails the solitary wave. That is, the solution
is no longer a symmetric sech
2
pulse, but instead the wave
decays at its left boundary with a larger height than at its
054901-7 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
right boundary. The shelf elevation is
O
while its length is
O
−1
. The detailed
→
dynamics have been analyzed
21
by way of the transformation,
V
s
,
=
u
s
,
exp
,
which is used to convert
43
to a variable-coefficient KdV
equation,
u
+
b
2
e
uu
s
+
h
2
24
u
sss
=0.
It is found that on a sufficiently large time scale, the trailing
shelf degenerates into a train of small-amplitude solitary
waves.
C. Numerics
We have performed direct numerical simulations of real-
istic transmission lines, using a finite-difference scheme. Af-
ter describing the numerical scheme, we discuss different test
cases. Our first goal is to validate our continuum models by
comparing their predictions against numerical solutions of
the underlying semidiscrete equations. Our second goal is to
demonstrate useful applications through carefully selected
numerical experiments.
1. Scheme
Equations
23
and
41
are, respectively, linear and non-
linear continuum models of the semidiscrete system
20
.
Continuum models are very useful for analytical studies; for
numerical studies, we work directly with the semidiscrete
system
20
, which we rewrite here,
dI
n
+1/2
dt
=
V
n
−
V
n
+1
n
+1/2
,
n
0,1,2,
¼
,
N
,
44a
dV
n
dt
=
I
n
−1/2
−
I
n
+1/2
c
n
V
n
,
n
1,2,
¼
,
N
−1
.
44b
As in the continuum model, we take the line to be initially
dead,
V
n
0
= 0 and
dV
n
dt
0
=0,
n
0,
45
and we also incorporate sinusoidal forcing at the left bound-
ary,
V
0
t
=
A
sin
t
.
46
However, for obvious reasons, the computational transmis-
sion line cannot be semi-infinite. We terminate the line at
node
N
, necessitating the right boundary condition,
V
N
t
=
I
N
−1/2
t
R
,
47
where
R
is the termination resistance. We choose
R
such that
the reflection coefficient at the right boundary is practically
zero. Taking
44
–
47
together, we have a closed system for
the interior voltages and inductances. We solve this system
directly using the standard ode45 Runge-Kutta method in
MATLAB
.
2. Remark
The procedure described above is entirely equivalent to
solving the partial differential equations
PDEs
23
and
41
by the method of lines combined with a finite-difference
spatial discretization. The method is accurate to second order
in space and fourth order in time.
3. Results
First we simulate a linear exponentially tapered line. As
predicted by the perturbative theory, we see two modes
propagating inside an exponentially shaped envelope. As
shown in Fig. 2, the amplitude of the wave increases slowly
as a function of element number.
Next we simulate both uniform and nonuniform NLTLs.
In the nonuniform case, we use the exponential tapering de-
scribed above. We observe in Fig. 3
a
that sinusoids are now
converted to solitonlike wave forms. If we switch on nonuni-
formity, multiple pulse generation is suppressed, as shown in
Fig. 3
b
. That is, fewer solitonic pulses are generated from
the same incoming sinusoidal signal.
The nonuniformity also allows us to narrow the width of
pulses considerably, as demonstrated in Fig. 4. Note that Fig.
4 also shows that the resulting pulses are not symmetric, as
predicted by theory. The asymmetry appears on the left
trail-
ing
side of the pulse.
To summarize,
i
the nonuniform linear transmission
line can be used for pulse compression/voltage amplification.
However, the frequency and speed of outgoing waves cannot
be significantly altered using a linear circuit.
ii
The nonuni-
form nonlinear transmission line can increase both the volt-
age amplitude and the frequency content of incoming waves.
We now generalize 1D transmission lines to 2D transmission
lattices. The extra dimension allows us to create a circuit that
can simultaneously upconvert and combine incoming sig-
nals.
FIG. 2.
Color online
Voltage
V
i
vs element number
i
at
T
=10nsfora1D
nonuniform linear transmission line with parameters:
N
=100,
L
0
=0.1 nH,
and
C
0
=1 pF. The input, at the left end of the line
i
=0
, is a sinusoid with
frequency
=5 GHz.
054901-8 Afshari
etal.
J. Appl. Phys.
99
, 054901
2006
Downloaded 26 Mar 2006 to 131.215.225.9. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp