Published July 17, 2019 | Version Published + Accepted Version
Book Section - Chapter Open

Equation-of-state constraints and the QCD phase transition in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy

  • 1. ROR icon GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research
  • 2. ROR icon University of Wrocław
  • 3. ROR icon Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
  • 4. ROR icon Georgia Institute of Technology
  • 5. ROR icon Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  • 6. ROR icon RIKEN
  • 7. ROR icon Laboratory Universe and Theories
  • 8. ROR icon Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

Contributors

Abstract

We describe a multi-messenger interpretation of GW170817, which yields a robust lower limit on NS radii. This excludes NSs with radii smaller than about 10.7 km and thus rules out very soft nuclear matter. We stress the potential of this type of constraints when future detections become available. For instance, a very similar argumentation may yield an upper bound on the maximum mass of nonrotating NSs. We also discuss simulations of NS mergers, which undergo a first-order phase transition to quark matter. We point out a different dynamical behavior. Considering the gravitational-wave signal, we identify an unambiguous signature of the QCD phase transition in NS mergers. We show that the occurrence of quark matter through a strong first-order phase transition during merging leads to a characteristic shift of the dominant postmerger frequency. The frequency shift is indicative for a phase transition if it is compared to the postmerger frequency which is expected for purely hadronic EoS models. A very strong deviation of several 100 Hz is observed for hybrid EoSs in an otherwise tight relation between the tidal deformability and the postmerger frequency. In future events the tidal deformability will be inferred with sufficient precision from the premerger phase, while the dominant postmerger frequency can be obtained when current detectors reach a higher sensitivity in the high-frequency range within the next years. Finally, we address the potential impact of a first-order phase transition on the electromagnetic counter-part of NS mergers. Our simulations suggest that there would be no significant qualitative differences between a system undergoing a phase transition to quark matter and purely hadronic mergers. The quantitative differences are within the spread which is found between different hadronic EoS models. This implies on the one hand that GW170817 is compatible with a possible transition to quark matter. On the other hand these considerations show that it may not be easy to identify quantitative differences between purely hadronic mergers and events in which quark matter occurs considering solely their electromagnetic counterpart or their nucleosynthesis products.

Additional Information

© 2019 Author(s). Published Online: 17 July 2019. AB acknowledges support by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 759253 and the German Research Foundation (DFG) via the Collaborative Research Center SFB 881 "The Milky Way System". NUFB and TF acknowledge support from the Polish National Science Center (NCN) under grant no. UMO-2016/23/B/ST2/00720. DB acknowledges support through the Russian Science Foundation under project No. 17-12-01427 and the MEPhI Academic Excellence Project under contract No. 02.a03.21.0005. We acknowledge stimulating discussions during the EMMI Rapid Reaction Task Force: The physics of NS mergers at GSI/FAIR and the support of networking activities by the COST Actions CA15213 "THOR", CA16117 "ChETEC", CA16214 "PHAROS" and CA16104G "GWVerse". OJ is supported by the Special Postdoctoral Researchers (SPDR) program and the iTHEMS cluster at RIKEN. NS is supported by the ARIS facility of GRNET in Athens (GWAVES and GRAVASYM allocations). HTJ is grateful for support by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through Collaborative Research Center SFB 1258 "Neutrinos and Dark Matter in Astro- and Particle Physics" (NDM) and the Excellence Cluster Universe (EXC 153; http://www.universecluster.de/). The Flatiron Institute is supported by the Simons Foundation. JC acknowledges support from NSF award PHY-1505524.

Attached Files

Published - 1.5117803.pdf

Accepted Version - 1904.01306.pdf

Files

1.5117803.pdf

Files (1.9 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8ccda2e5f720e295038558ffcf321749
1.1 MB Preview Download
md5:6fd5421a6c57b873d2b4b48e56490222
820.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
104608
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20200728-123808771

Related works

Funding

European Research Council (ERC)
759253
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
SFB 881
National Science Centre (Poland)
UMO-2016/23/B/ST2/00720
Russian Science Foundation
17-12-01427
National Research Nuclear University
02.a03.21.0005
European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST)
CA15213
European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST)
CA16117
European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST)
CA16214
European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST)
CA16104G
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
SFB 1258
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
EXC 153
Simons Foundation
NSF
PHY-1505524

Dates

Created
2020-07-28
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2022-02-02
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Series Name
AIP Conference Proceedings
Series Volume or Issue Number
2127