Published April 20, 2006 | Version public
Journal Article

Structures and Properties of Newton Black Films Characterized Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

We used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the structures and properties of Newton black films (NBF) for several surfactants:  sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (C16TAB), and surfactin using film thicknesses up to 10 nm. By calculating the interface formation energy for various packing conditions on the surface pressure−area isotherm, we found that the most probable surface concentration is ∼42 Å2/molecule for SDS and C16TAB and ∼170 Å^2/molecule for surfactin. We then used this most probable concentration of each surfactant to simulate NBF with various film thicknesses. From analyzing the disjoining pressure−film thickness isotherms with the density profiles and the solvation coordination number, we found that the increase of the disjoining pressure during the film thinning was coupled with the change in inner structure of the NBF (i.e., density profile and the solvation of ionic entities). In the range of film thicknesses less than ∼30 Å, the disjoining pressures for the SDS and C16TAB were found to be larger than that of the surfactin. We predicted the Gibbs elasticity (175 dyn/cm for surfactin; 109 dyn/cm for C16TAB; 38 dyn/cm for SDS) required to assess the stability of NBF against surface concentration fluctuations, and the shear modulus (6.5 GPa for the surfactin; 6.1 GPa for the C16TAB; 3.5 GPa for the SDS) and the yield stress (∼0.8 GPa for surfactin; ∼0.8 GPa for C16TAB; ∼0.4 GPa for the SDS) to assess the mechanical stability against the externally imposed mechanical perturbation.

Additional Information

© 2006 American Chemical Society. Received: November 18, 2005; In Final Form: February 3, 2006. Publication Date (Web): March 31, 2006. We thank Dr. Bradley A. Williams, Dr. Joanne Jones-Meehan, and Dr. Alok Singh for their fruitful discussions. This research was supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (ONR-N00014-04-1-0590). The facilities of the Materials and Process Simulation Center used for these studies were supported by DURIP-ARO, DURIP-ONR, IBM-SUR, NSF (MRI). Other support for the MSC was provided by MURI-ARO, MURI-ONR, DOE, ONR, NSF-CSEM, NIH, General Motors, ChevronTexaco, and Beckman Institute.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
77468
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170515-152351493

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)
Army Research Office (ARO)
Office of Naval Research (ONR)
N00014-04-1-0590
IBM
Department of Energy (DOE)
NSF
NIH
General Motors
ChevronTexaco
Caltech Beckman Institute

Dates

Created
2017-05-16
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-15
Created from EPrint's last_modified field